[nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?
- From: Julien Claassen <julien@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:24:08 +0200 (CEST)
Evening Joel!
Yeah, I saw that note a few minutes, after I replied to the other mail. I'll
have a look at that. I pulled and make'd the latest Nama yesterday night,
after I finished reading the mails. My first exploration of this version
should be taking place tonight.
Expectantly yours
Julien
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Such Is Life: Very Intensely Adorable;
Free And Jubilating Amazement Revels, Dancing On - FLOWERS!
====== Find my music at ======
http://juliencoder.de/nama/music.html
.....................................
"If you live to be 100, I hope I live to be 100 minus 1 day,
so I never have to live without you." (Winnie the Pooh)
Other related posts:
- » [nama] If we include LV2, why not libosc?- Joel Roth
- » [nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?- S. Massy
- » [nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?- Joel Roth
- » [nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?- S. Massy
- » [nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?- Joel Roth
- » [nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?- S. Massy
- » [nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?- Joel Roth
- » [nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?- Julien Claassen
- » [nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?- Julien Claassen
- » [nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?- Julien Claassen
- » [nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?- Joel Roth
- » [nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc? - Julien Claassen