[nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?

From: Joel Roth <joelz@xxxxxxxxx>
To: nama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 13:03:39 -1000

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:01:33AM +0200, Julien Claassen wrote:
> Hey Massy!
>   From my usability lecture: Minimise the user's memory load.
> Numbers are generally harder to remember than useful names. So in
> your example:
> Nama> fxreg add 1891 compressor
> Nama> fxreg add 3309 hard_compressor
> Nama fxreg add etd stereo_delay

We fortunately don't have to deal with
creating such syntax. You just have
to look at nama/src/custom.pl to 
see how to create your own effect
shortcuts

-- 
Joel Roth

Follow-Ups:
- [nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?
  - From: Julien Claassen

References:
- [nama] If we include LV2, why not libosc?
  - From: Joel Roth
- [nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?
  - From: S. Massy
- [nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?
  - From: Joel Roth
- [nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?
  - From: S. Massy
- [nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?
  - From: Julien Claassen

[nama] Re: If we include LV2, why not libosc?

Other related posts: