I actually have the MPEGLA documents right in front of me and I can read: -------------------------------- 1.20 MPEG-2 Intermediate Product - shall mean any instrumentality or combination of instrumentalities, including by way of example and without limitation an integrated circuit chip or chip set, a subsystem circuit board(s), firmware, and software, which is primarily designed to be used, alone or with other instrumentalities, to encode or decode video information in a format in compliance with the MPEG-2 Standard, but which is not a product that is Sold. 1.30 Sale (Sold) - shall mean any sale, rental, lease, license or other form of distribution of an MPEG02 Royalty Product to an end user, either directly or through a chain of distribution. For purposes of this Agreement, a Sale under this Section 1.30 shall be deemed to take place in the country where an end user takes delivery of the MPEG-2 Royalty Product which is the subject of the "Sale." irrespective of the manner in which the "Sale" takes place. 2.1 MPEG-2 Intermediate Products. Subject to Paragraph 7.16.1 hereof and to the other terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Licensing Administrator hereby grants to Licensee a royalty-free, worldwide, nonexclusive, nontransferable sublicense under all MPEG-2 Essential Patent(s) in the MPEG-2 Patent Portfolio, to make, have made, use only by Licensee solely for internal development and testing purposes, and sell, offer for sale or otherwise distribute, MPEG-2 Intermediate Products. NO LICENSE IS GRANTED HEREIN, BY IMPLICATION OTHERWISE, TO CUSTOMERS OF LICENSEE TO USE MPEG-2 INTERMEDIATE PRODUCTS MANUFACTURED OR SOLD BY LICENSEE. 7.16.1 MPEG-2 Intermediate Products Notice: Licensee agrees to provie to its customers or any other party that receives from it an MPEG-2 Intermediate Product licensed under Section 2.1 of this Agreement a notice which specifies that: "USE OF THIS PRODUCT IN ANY MANNER THAT COMPLIES WITH THE MPEG-2 STANDARD IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT A LICENSE UNDER APPLICABLE PATENTS IN THE MPEG-2 PATENT PORTFOLIO, WHICH LICENSE IS AVAILABLE FROM MPEG LA, L.L.C., 250 STELLE STREET, SUITE 300, DENVER, COLORADO 80206." --------------------------- So there you have it. In MediaPipe 0.8.9, we did not put the notice, so it is in fact illegal, but I think it can be tolerated until we release something more official (MediaPipe actually neglects a few GPL/BSD licenses, but we plan to fix all that before 1.0 is released). The difficulty is to have your product be recognized as an "intermediate product". MediaPipe is convenient when it comes to licenses since everything is implemented as plugins... On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 07:23 PM, Makira wrote: > >> >> Hi again, >> >> The first thing I'd like to discuss with everyone is the current >> hesitation >> to release binary ready-to-run MPEG-1/2 encoders. I believe Major >> mentioned >> it in his release notes relative to MJPEG tools. >> >> Does anyone have an example of a free binary encoder being attacked? >> I'm >> not sure that MPEG-2 encoding will be freely and widely available on >> the >> Mac platform until someone releases ready-to-run software. >> >> Since Mac OS X has freely available development tools, one option is >> to create preconfigured package which compiles with as little effort >> as >> clicking an icon. >> >> -James >> > > The mpeg2enc in the mpegEncoder pipe in MediaPipe 0.8.9 comes > precompiled. > > AFAIK, distributing an mpeg2 encoder is license free if : > > -distribution is free > -it isn't a product in itself > > The mpegEncoder pipe isn't a product in itself, that's clear, but as > to know > if distributing mpeg2enc inside it makes it one, I don't know. I guess > not, > since mpeg2enc needs y4m input, so it inself, it isn't usable. > >