>on 1/10/01 19:31, Tee Cashmore.1 at tee.cashmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> Payton Cannon wrote: >> >>> My question is, doesn't this make for a >>> very, very large chunk of HD dedicated to the operating system? I >>> mean, it seems the update is in additon to the more basic version. I >>> haven't installed obviously, and any input on this would be >>> appreciated. Thanx and, aloha. > >If you're running OS X already you will not be dedicating any new HD space >to the OS. OS X 10.1 is a pretty heavy-duty re-write of OS X 10.0.4 and >replaces instead of adding components (purportedly getting rid of quite a >few of the problems associated with it). > >> >> Hi, >> It sort of makes the "minimum 128 megs ram" to run O/S X seem a tad >> shy!! Seems like we're going the way of the big blue machines. Mind you >> there are those on Delphi.com/macos that claim to have hacked a few bits >> of pieces out of X. >> OTOH 600 M may be much less when installed. > ><chuckle> 128 MB as a minimum. HAHAHAHA. That's like saying that 32 MB is >sufficient to run OS 9 with Word, Photoshop and Netscrape at the same time >under virtual memory. You *need* at least 256 MB to run without constantly >hitting virtual memory, and preferably more. 320 IS NOT ENOUGH if you want >to do anything complex. > >Considering how cheap RAM is I don't even think that it's an issue. Last >Thursday I saw a 256 MB PC133 SD-RAM for $50 CDN in a clone computer store. >It'll work in any desktop and newer iMac that runs OS X, from the G3/233 >through to the G4/800 DP. RAM for laptops is only marginally more expensive. >You can get 128 MB SO-DIMMs for under $50 which'll fit in iMacs and G3 >Powerbooks. I'm waiting until November before adding a 256 MB DIMM (hoping >prices will drop even more... I've seen a 50% price drop since April) to >bump things to 576 MB (that should keep me happy until 2003... when I need >more I'll replace the 64 with a 256) > >L8r, Eric. > >Yep - hear THAT! Actually, 576 is exactly what I'm running on this >here G3,bronze, firewire. Eric, I tried putting two 512's in cause >this site told me it could be done and succeded in shorting out the >daughterboard. At this point, I've got the 512 topslot and the 64 in >the bottom. I have a 128 sitting here staring me in the face but I >got a little gun shy after that last experience - I wonder, will the >bottom slot of a 400M take it? And Tee Cashmore - yep that's what I understand as of recently also. If I wasn't going to do some traveling next week I'd have installed this OS X by now - but at this point, I just can't afford to take the time with the new OS. Gimmie two weeks and I'll be BSBing with the best of ya. I am really anxious ... Users can subscribe to the List by sending an email to <muglo-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> with 'subscribe' in the Subject field Users can unsubscribe from the List by sending an email to <muglo-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field Users must send messages or replies to <muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> All messages are archived so that you can view them at any time by going to <//www.freelists.org/archives/muglo> Problems concerning use of the FreeList should be sent to <paulthomas@xxxxxxx> Don't forget to periodically check our web site at: http://muglo.on.ca/