But in transcripts there shouldn't be CA repeats, or GATC, etc. ;) I agree, in genomic data reality is different so you may eventually succeed to assemble even these simple repeats. M Jose Huguet Tapia wrote: > "But the point is not to overcome the error message and keep the crap in the > dataset but to either properly > clean the input data or to drop it and make the life easier to the assembler. > It is also faster so "forget > this possibility". ;-)" > > depends if the 'crap" is real "crap" or is a real composition of a complex > genome. Of course depends the types of repeats that you have in your list. > > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Martin MOKREJŠ <mmokrejs@xxxxxxxxx > <mailto:mmokrejs@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Jose Huguet Tapia wrote: > > Hello Victoria, > > I believe that you could set the megahubs limit to a 1. > > But the point is not to overcome the error message and keep the crap in > the dataset but to either properly > clean the input data or to drop it and make the life easier to the > assembler. It is also faster so "forget > this possibility". ;-) > > > add > > > > -SK:mmhr=1 (for 1 % megahub accepted) > > > > Which version are you using? I work with V 4.0. and I found that the > megahub limit is set up to 90. I do not if this right. Maybe Bastien could > have a suggestion. My case seems to be more dramatical!. I have more than 90 > > Thanks > > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Offord, Victoria <vofford@xxxxxxxxx > <mailto:vofford@xxxxxxxxx> <mailto:vofford@xxxxxxxxx > <mailto:vofford@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote: > > > > Hi, ____ > > > > __ __ > > > > My MIRA run on a parasite transcriptome keeps ending with:____ > > > > __ __ > > > > You have 0.1052271917% of your reads as megahubs.____ > > > > You have set a maximum allowed ratio of: 0.0000000000____ -- You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html