Dale, Sorry about not getting to you sooner. I worked late this evening. As you have probably already discovered, the construction guide only covers the Digital Board and part of the Main Board. I've only completed the baseband audio portion so far. I hope to resume work on building my Minima and working on the construction guide soon. Part of my challenge is building necessary and sufficient test and measurement tools as I construct the RF sections of the Main Board. I also want to build and test the RF sections such that completed sections can be used to help test subsequent sections. 73, Mac AE5PH On 10/16/2014 07:53 PM, Dale Ward wrote:
Thanks guys, time to start building. Dale WB4LIPOn Thursday, October 16, 2014, Steve VK2SJA <vk2sja@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:vk2sja@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:>Is there a link somewhere to your construction guide? minima_main_page | ae5phradionotebook <https://sites.google.com/site/ae5phradionotebook/minima_main_page> Down towards the bottom of the page. > > WB4LIP > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Mac A. Cody <maccody@xxxxxxx <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> Steve, >> >> Sorry about the misunderstanding. I had forgotten that the >> circuitry of the bidirectional amp was not symmetrical. >> >> Glad you like my construction guide. I've taken a bit of >> a 'breather' from working on it due to time, other projects, >> waiting for design issues to sort out, and a bit of personal >> 'burnout' on the Minima project. The notes that you are >> working on is a great idea. >> >> 73, >> >> Mac AE5PH >> >> >> On 10/14/2014 10:03 PM, Steve VK2SJA wrote: >> >>> Thanks Mac, >>> >>> This is Joe's own suggestion for the TX side of the bidirectional amp. >>> Joe >>> and I were talking about the other side/direction, the RX side of the >>> amp. >>> >>> I think Joe was saying he thought that he may have seen somebody else's >>> suggested mod to reduce current here? At least that's how I was reading >>> it. >>> >>> Great "Construction Guide" BTW. >>> >>> 73, Steve. >>> >>> >>> >>> Steve, >>>> >>>> I've copied Joe Rocci's original post below. >>>> >>>> TL'DR: >>>> Change the 220 Ohm collector resistor to 1000 Ohms to decrease >>>> the current consumption. Increase the emitter degeneration >>>> resistor to 20 Ohms to bump the gain up to 20 dB. >>>> >>>> 73, >>>> >>>> Mac AE5PH >>>> >>>> Original message posted by Joe Rocci: >>>> Hi Steve >>>> >>>> Here are some results from modeling the Tx section in LTSpice: >>>> >>>> 1) Gain is about 17db @ 20 mhz >>>> 2) Input match (return loss) is about 16db and pretty flat up to 50 >>>> Mhz >>>> 3) Output match is quite good, at the expense of about 6db gain loss, >>>> due to the series output matching resistor >>>> 4) Current draw is about 55ma >>>> >>>> Some comments: >>>> 1) The voltage-amp stage is biased at almost 11 volts on the >>>> collector, >>>> leaving very little headroom for large voltage swings. >>>> 2) The emitter follower buffer stages draw the lion's share of the DC >>>> current, but are non-optimum for driving large voltage swings into >>>> non-resistive loads at high frequencies; that's why so much static DC >>>> current is required. >>>> 3) If you increase the 220 ohm collector resistor to 1000 ohms, the >>>> collector drops closer to 5.5 V, and the overall current consumption >>>> drops to about 28 ma. If you then increase the emitter degeneration >>>> resistor to 20 ohms, you end up with about 20 dB gain (@20 Mhz), 22 dB >>>> input match, and presumably much better output voltage swing headroom. >>>> I >>>> discovered all this while trying to goose the amp up for a little >>>> better >>>> performance at 30 Mhz, anticipating a new crystal filter. >>>> >>>> Of course, all of this is 'on paper' and needs to be verified. >>>> >>>> Joe >>>> W3JDR >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/14/2014 08:22 PM, Steve VK2SJA wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks Joe, >>>>> >>>>> So ~16 to 20dB in both directions. >>>>> >>>>> I had a quick look around the archive this morning. If there is a mod >>>>> for >>>>> reducing current in the RX side of the bidirectional amp I've managed >>>>> to >>>>> miss it. >>>>> >>>>> Anyone know of such a mod? >>>>> >>>>> The original W7ZOI bidirectional amp article quotes a noise figure of >>>>> 5.8dB when the amp was setup for about 16dB of gain. So 4.5dB seems >>>>> an >>>>> improvement on that and around the same ball park. So the LTSpice >>>>> simulation is probably on the money. >>>>> >>>>> Last night I was reading EMRFD and learnt how to go about measuring >>>>> noise >>>>> properly. I've ordered a LNA and when it arrives I'll try measure it >>>>> in >>>>> the real-world and report back. >>>>> >>>>> I've been reading that at HF frequencies there is so much atmospheric >>>>> noise that a 3kHz wide SSB rig will typically see about 14dB of >>>>> noise. >>>>> And >>>>> that as such any amp with a noise factor (NF) of of a bit less than >>>>> ~14dB >>>>> is probably adequate for this application. Because you won't see the >>>>> locally generated amp noise over the atmospheric noise anyway. So >>>>> while >>>>> we >>>>> should always design and build as best we can. From a practical stand >>>>> point is there anything to be gained by reducing the NF to a figure >>>>> much >>>>> below ~6dB? >>>>> >>>>> 73, Steve. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Steve >>>>>> >>>>>> LTSpice simulation indicates about 16db gain at 20 mhz with the >>>>>> component >>>>>> values shown on the web page. The standing current is also very >>>>>> high, >>>>>> at >>>>>> over 40ma. I think there was a mod to bring the current down? Also, >>>>>> the >>>>>> simulated noise figure is about 4.5db, pretty high. However, I've >>>>>> never >>>>>> checked to see how accurate LTSpice is in this regard. >>>>>> >>>>>> Joe >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> From: "Steve VK2SJA" <vk2sja@xxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>> >>>>>> To: <minima@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>> >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 6:40 AM >>>>>> Subject: [minima] RX gain of Bidirectional Amp? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Guys, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The gain of the Minima Bidirectional Amp in the TX direction is ~16 >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> 20dB. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can someone tell me what the gain is supposed to be for the other >>>>>>> half >>>>>>> of >>>>>>> the duel Amp, in the RX direction? Same? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 73, Steve. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >