[mea] Re: Interesting editing article in The Globe & Mail

  • From: "Jonah O'Neil" <jonah.oneil@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: mea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 17:22:10 -0600

Cheri - I used to be an editor at Naylor.  As far as I know, they still have
editors in Toronto and for sure in the US (none in Winnipeg).  However, the
other week Naylor did layoff its entire production department in Winnipeg -
graphic designers, proofreaders, etc, about 42 people in all - outsourced to
a company in New Jersey, who may in turn be outsourcing overseas, not sure.

-Jonah

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:05 PM, <cheri.frazer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks for sharing this, Susan. I have mixed feelings about it: on the one
> hand, I want to lament the decline of standards in publishing, but on the
> other I'm happy for the freelancers. I suppose a lot will depend on the
> pocketbooks of writers. If they're poor will they go to the retired teacher
> down the road and ignore the professionals? Hmm. Interesting issue. I
> remember when Naylor was going to outsource its editing to India; not sure
> if that happened.
>
> -Cheri
>
>
>
>
>  From: Susan Portelance <susan.portelance@xxxxxxxxx> To: mea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: 2011-02-09 03:40 PM Subject: [mea] Interesting editing article in
> The Globe & Mail Sent by: mea-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am a new member of the MEA and I thought this article from The Globe &
> Mail may be pertinent to many of us.
>
>
> *
> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/books/where-have-all-the-book-editors-gone/article1894501/
> *<http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/books/where-have-all-the-book-editors-gone/article1894501/>
>
> Thank you,
> Susan Portelance
> "PLEASE NOTE: The preceding information may be confidential or privileged.
> It only should be used or disseminated for the purpose of conducting
> business with Parker. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify
> the sender by replying to this message and then delete the information from
> your system. Thank you for your cooperation."

Other related posts: