I am not intaking oxygen waiting for the gricean chemical approach On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 8:32 AM, cblists@xxxxxxxx <cblists@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 03 Oct 2014, at 23:57, Eric <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'm with Nagel. Materialist physical reductionism is almost certainly > > wrong: wrong as science; wrong as philosophy. It is our current error, a > > hidden religion inside science, especially as it is presented to > > laypeople. > > I'm in your and Nagel's camp - perhaps at the fanatical forefront. (Is > that a mixture of metaphors?) 'Fanatical'- in that I would leave out the > 'almost'. > > Physical reductionism is wrong. By that I mean (i.e., would argue), when > we restrict ourselves to accounts of the world in which 'materialist > physical reductionism' is 'the only language game in town' (now that's MORE > than just a mixture of metaphors), we impose an unacceptable (at least in > my fanatical opinion) restriction on our 'form of life'. > > (My - no doubt heretically twisted - Wittgensteinian roots are showing, I > know.) > > In my opinion, the error arises because people forget that 'science' is > and will ever remain 'natural philosophy'; when that is forgotten that your > 'hidden religion' arises. > > Chris Bruce, > still celebrating > Enlightenment's birthday, > in Kiel, Germany > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > > -- palma, etheKwini, KZN palma cell phone is 0762362391 *only when in Europe*: inst. J. Nicod 29 rue d'Ulm f-75005 paris france