[lit-ideas] score
- From: palma <palmaadriano@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 16:19:40 +0200
a score is not a reduction since it is notational.
if one were to hold such a view it is of the same level of stupidity of
those who think sentences are noises.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 11:57 PM, Eric <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> the Tenth as a W3.3 object from any attempt to embody this object by
> W1 means - say by reducing it to a "score" or by performance.
>
>
> REDUCING? This is what I do not understand. How does the musical score
> constitute a reduction? There is a primary experience, that of DS
> composing the symphony, but how can the score (or for that matter a
> performance) be "a reduction"?
>
> I'm with Nagel. Materialist physical reductionism is almost certainly
> wrong: wrong as science; wrong as philosophy. It is our current error, a
> hidden religion inside science, especially as it is presented to
> laypeople.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
>
>
--
palma, etheKwini, KZN
palma
cell phone is 0762362391
*only when in Europe*:
inst. J. Nicod
29 rue d'Ulm
f-75005 paris france
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] score - palma
