On 26 May 2004 at 13:53, John Wager wrote: > Calling the war a "Civil War" implies acceptance of the "Northern" > view of sovereignty: There is ONE entity, the "United States," and > parts of that single entity are at war with other (internal) parts. A > "civil" war. But in Florida in 1964 the people in charge of textbooks > thought that the "Southern" view was still correct: OK, so then it makes sense that there's still much resistance to terming the armed insurgence in South Africa up until 1994 as a "civil war". Only last month etc etc... Concerning the mosaic metaphor: I wonder if each element can maintain its distinction in a post-war articulation. Otoh, with Henry Giroux: "teach the conflicts". Cheers, -t -- Torgeir Fjeld torgfje2@xxxxxxxxxx http://home.no.net/torgfje/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html