[lit-ideas] Re: archives?
- From: Julie Krueger <juliereneb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 12:44:09 -0600
John --
2002 is "really old"?? I'm a dinosaur ...I have e-mals gong back to 1997.
Julie Krueger
apparently even a vrtual hoarder
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Julie Krueger <juliereneb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You know, Carol, I discovered that by accident a long time ago & I had
> forgotten. Yes, it creeped me out too. And yes, think I didn't post for
> weeks after.
>
> Julie Krueger
> trying to dodge all the double edged swords flying about
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:06 AM, carol kirschenbaum <carolkir@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Julie,
>> A propos lit-id being archived, a related thought: Google your own name.
>> It's likely that your posts to lit-id will pop up (that's the old sense of
>> the term, not as in advertisement!). I found that revelation--though
>> commonsensical, in retrospect--quite chilling. There's a difference, I feel,
>> between promiscuosly and so easily googling up our posts and searching them
>> out on a server. Most people do the former, few the latter. Anyway, I
>> clammed up more.
>>
>> Carol
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Julie Krueger <juliereneb@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>
>>> Is there still a way to access the old Phil-lit archives? And is Lit-Id
>>> being archived somewhere?
>>>
>>> Julie Krueger
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 1
>
1
Other related posts:
