Eric Yost wrote: "Please be patient and explain its significance if you want." 1. Government does what needs to be done when the people can't do it. 2. There are no responsibilities of government except those determined by 1. 3. If the people can do it, government cannot be shirking its responsibilities by not also doing it. Significance: One cannot hold government responsible for cutting programs when those programs merely duplicate what is being done by the people. Conclusion: There is only the appearance of a dilemma with regards to supporting charity because of the faulty assumption that government has responsibilities beyond those it actually has. Sincerely, Phil Enns Toronto, ON ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html