In a message dated 6/27/2011 10:42:27 A.M, phil.enns@xxxxxxxxx writes: Derrida's argument is that the structural quality of language use which makes possible the usage that Austin dismisses as parasitical, is the very quality which makes language use possible. The ability to use words in a virtually infinite number of contexts is a condition for the possibility of language and so the attempt to delimit a particular usage as more originary and other usages as parasitical or derivative is arbitrary. Grice of course disagrees -- or disagrices, if you mustn't. Grice sees lingo as maximally exchange of informativeness. Even orders, like "Love me!" is an exchange of info from an utterer to an addressee ("utterer informs addressee that he loves her"). It would be otiose in a genuine monologue to have, "Love me!" -- the utterer already knows that, and it is useless to 'inform yourself' about stuff. ---- And so on. There is nothing arbitrary about Grice's transcendental justification: conversational moves are reasonable (if not rational) only on condition that they serve towards this maximally exchange of info. Hamlet's "To be or not to be, that is the question" is thus derivative, in that i. it is a character in ii. 'genuine' monologue two otiosities wrapped in one -- and for a price! Austin and Grice were of course contemporary and met every Saturday morning for 25 years. Austin was slightly younger which helped. He never allowed anyone his senior to lead the conversation, and so Grice was pretty much welcomed. They were never friends, though. When Austin died in 1960, Grice took the lead with those Morning meetings -- he just met at Corpus Christi, his alma mater, but by 1967 he was pretty bored with the whole thing, and having seen this magnificent Spanish colonial house up in the Berkeley hills, he decided to leave his flat in Woodstock Road, Oxford and settled permanently in this grand view to the Bay of all Bays. When he died, he was cremated and his ashed spread over the bay he had come to love. I wouldn't know if Derrida ever met with Grice. There was an attempt to teach the French the rudiments of analytic philosophy -- Urmson, Grice, Austin, Strawson, contributed. The thing was published in French, "philosophie analytique". The attempt failed. ("Different ligos, different mind sets", as Coco Chanel, quoting Sapir-Whorf had predicted). A pity, because the Encyclopedists like Diderot had dreamed of French as "lingua franca rationalis". Cheers, Speranza ---- Grice and others. ---- Locke, Myself and others. ---- The other Grice ---- Grice and the other. ---- Conversations with myself. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html