Back in the day, let's not get into numbers here, it was as such that one thought of Europe as belonging to the guarde avant of social policy. It had the State de Welfare, Coal and Steel Agreement (Union de Roma), fagotted expats (the WIlde Oscar in the IV Republic) and so forth. However today thing are -- or so they seem -- different. Reading the "reactionary" New York Times one wonders -- has the World of Olde at last earned its name? One can't really be opposed to Austerity on Europe. Then one seems irrational and Completely Out Of Touch with Commonly Agreed Knowledge. Nonetheless, reading Paul Krugman in NYT one wonders. The commentator, located as he is in the Neo-Liberl Republic of America (NRA), claims that the reasons "European Leaders" have tabled for convincing working Europeans that they really should admit they've been living beyond means (this in contrast to the well-heeled Europeans, who have been paying too much taxes) and tighten their belts -- well, those reasons have been tabled "in the teeth of evidence". The crisis, Krugman claims, is NOT about fical irresponsibility -- and the "savage austerity" measures imposed from on high have made "a terrible situation worse." You thought this was BAD -- coming from a commentator in a country where social insurance is a legally imposed gift from the working person to insurance companies --? Well, wait. It gets worse. According Krugman that European elite has gotten into a "habit of disguising ideology as expertise, of pretending that what it wants to do is what must be done" and this approach has "created a dificit of legitimacy." So, in the post-cCarthyan NRA one is allowed to talk about ideology in the national broadsheet (and not getting sacked), one can hint at critique of the establishement (still while not getting the boot), and one can make the claim that there is evidence in the field of Scientific Economics that counter that FACT that Austerity is The Only Way to Salvation. WTF. -t Sendt fra en Samsung Mobil