[lit-ideas] Re: SOS or Charles Taylor's Sources of the Self
- From: "Andy Amago" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 10:58:49 -0400
Mmm, I don't think so. 'Conversation' is pretty straight forward. Love is
much more abstract, debatable. Me thinks, anyway. And therefore I am.
Logging off. Oh, the hazards of just one post ...
> [Original Message]
> From: Peter D. Junger <junger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 5/19/2006 10:23:35 AM
> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: SOS or Charles Taylor's Sources of the Self
>
> "Andy Amago" writes:
>
> : Likewise if I say love and to me it equates to having needs met
> : at someone's expense and to you it equates to sitting on Cloud 9, how
much
> : of a conversation would we have?
>
> Doesn't that depend upon what you mean by "conversation"?
>
> --
> Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH
> EMAIL: junger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx URL: http://samsara.law.cwru.edu
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
