Eric writes: Omar, given the obviously biased nature of the site at http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Peace/refreturn.html it would be interesting to see what errors you could find in their reasoning. *I don't want to argue with this point by point as the errors and omissions are fairly obvious. In the discussion of "international treaties" the article referes only to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, but not to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights where the right of return is mentioned more explicitly. As to the contention that: "There was no intention here to address the claims of masses of people who have been displaced as a by-product of war or by political transfers of territory or population" we have seen that a number of countries have instituted legislation precisely to deal with this sort of cases. To argue that the UN resolutions (which Israel did not implement) do not mention a "right" is disingenious in the extreme; surely the recommendation that the refugees should be permitted to return to their homes is based on the notion that they have a legal and moral right to do so. Above all, it is a particular chutzpa for Israel to deny another people the right of return to their land given that Israel itself was established on a notion that such a right existed in the case of the Jews and was valid even though a much longer time had elapsed. O.K. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html