[lit-ideas] Re: (No Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 23:50:18 -0500

  • From: "JUDITH EVANS" <judithevans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 22:46:45 -0000

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Paul" <robert.paul@xxxxxxxx>

> Judy wrote, after others had said various things:
>
> > My previous reply may not be all that relevant, the point I take it is
that
> > Larry Kramer was not among those Tony D'Amato threatened to sue.
>
> My point, in replying to Veronica, was that whatever went on between her
> and LK had nothing to do with what transpired between D'Amato and the
> Phil-Lit board.

Yes indeed; I'm sorry I muddied the waters.

 It's still unclear to me whether she believes that LK
> was somehow in a position to threaten others (e.g. D'Amato) as he did
> her because of some special standing he had on Phil-Lit. He had no
> special standing.

Right.  (I mean, he hadn't.)

 He did not kick D'Amato off. In threatening to sue
> Veronica he was acting entirely on his own.

Not that I know of this except from Veronica's post, but yes.

>
> I'll send an account of l'Affair D'Amato later when I can retrieve my
> notes from my other computer.

That might help some people here -- I was given what I think is a fairly
full account some while ago (by someone who's no longer a member of
Phil-Lit -- I don't mean Tony D'Amato, whom I did know off-List for a while)

Judy Evans, Cardiff

------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. lit-ideas
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2006