[lit-ideas] Re: Legal Reasoning

  • From: Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:46:13 -0500 (EST)

In a message dated 12/11/2013 4:10:53 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
"The example of Pilcher does involve  deductive reasoning in the "legal 
reasoning" but this deductive reasoning is  there only to make links between 
different aspects of World 3 content that  constitute the Pilcher problem."
 
Wikipedia has a rather extensive bibliography, I find, on 'casuistic'. So I 
 wonder, if the distinction can be made, to use the terms of McEvoy's not 
this  but earlier post, between
 
realist vs. conventionalist
 
AND between
 
case-based and principle-based?
 
It strikes me that another keyword may be CONSEQUENTIALISM.
 
The distinction case-based reasoning or casuistry as being _VERSUS_  
principle-based reasoning" is attested in Wikipedia:

As for 'consequentialism', it applies to where McEvoy sees his  
interpretation 'right' and the tutor's wrong. In McEvoy's words:
 
"The same may be said of "legal reasoning", turn and turn about. In the  
Pilcher case, we understand the "legal reasoning" in terms of understanding a  
World 3 problem-situation, which as my posts indicate may have many aspects 
and  even signficant aspects that are not obvious at first sight [e.g. that 
in  Pilcher a key to the problem is the effect of any solution on cases, 
unlike  Pilcher itself, where there is no trust over the house)."
 
Here above the word 'consequence' is not strictly used, but this quote  
from Consequentialism entry in Wikipedia may relate (or not). It is B. A. O.  
Williams's criticism to it!
 
"Bernard Williams has argued that consequentialism is alienating because it 
 requires moral agents to put too much distance between themselves and 
their own  projects and commitments. Williams argues that consequentialism 
requires moral  agents to take a strictly impersonal view of all actions, since 
it is only the  consequences, and not who produces them, that is said to 
matter. Williams argues  that this demands too much of moral agents—since (he 
claims) consequentialism  demands that they be willing to sacrifice any and 
all personal projects and  commitments in any given circumstance in order to 
pursue the most beneficent  course of action possible. He argues further that 
consequentialism fails to make  sense of intuitions that it can matter 
whether or not someone is personally the  author of a particular consequence. 
For example, that participating in a crime  can matter, even if the crime 
would have been committed anyway, or would even  have been worse, without the 
agent's participation."
 
Finally, in ps, the references to CASUISTRY, which feature Toulmin, if not, 
 apparently, Popper.
 
Cheers,
 
Speranza
 
---
 
Alonso, Alfred (1990). "The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral  
Reasoning." Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. XLIII, pp.  639–641.
Arnold, Carroll C. (1989). "The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of  Moral 
Reasoning." Quarterly Journal of Speech, Vol. 75, pp. 494–495.
Arras,  John D. (1991). "Getting Down to Cases: The Revival of Casuistry in 
Bioethics."  The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 16, pp. 29–51.
Biggar, Nigel.  (1989). "A Case for Casuistry in the Church." Modern 
Theology, Vol. 6, p.  29.
Blake, David C. (1992). "The Hospital Ethics Committee: Health Care's  
Moral Conscience or White Elephant?" Hastings Center Report, Vol. 22, pp.  6–12.
Bliton, Mark J. (1993). The Ethics of Clinical Ethics Consultation: On  the 
Way to Clinical Philosophy (Diss. Vanderbilt)
Boeyink, David E. (1992).  "Casuistry: A Case-Based Method for 
Journalists." Journal of Mass Media Ethics,  Vol. 7, pp. 107–120.
Boyle, Joseph. (1991). "Who is Entitled to Double  Effect?" Journal of 
Medicine and Philosophy, pp. 475–494.
Brody, Baruch A.  (1988). "Ethical Questions Raised by the Persistent 
Vegetative Patient."  Hastings Center Report, Vol. 18, pp. 33–37.
Brody, Baruch A. (1989). "A  Historical Introduction to Jewish Casuistry on 
Suicide and Euthanasia." in  Baruch A. Brody, Suicide and Euthanasia: 
Historical and Contemporary Themes  (Netherlands).
Brown, James F. (1991). "The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of  Moral 
Reasoning." America, p. 492.
Buckley, William Joseph. (1989). "The  Abuse of Casuistry: A History of 
Moral Reasoning." Journal of Religion, Vol. 69,  pp. 577–578.
Carlson, A. Cheree. (1992). "Creative Casuistry and Feminist  
Consciousness: The Rhetoric of Moral Reform." Quarterly Journal of Speech, Vol. 
 78, pp. 
16–33.
Carney, Bridget Mary. (1993). Modern Casuistry: An Essential  But 
Incomplete Method for Clinical Ethical Decision-Making. (Diss., Graduate  
Theological 
Union).
Carson, Ronald A. (1990). "Interpretive Bioethics: The  Way of 
Discernment." Theoretical Medicine, Vol. 11, pp. 51–59.
Carson, Ronald  A. (1988). "Paul Ramsey, Principled Protestant Casuist: A 
Retrospective."  Medical Humanities Review, Vol. 2, pp. 24–35.
Chidwick, Paula Marjorie  (1994). Approaches to Clinical Ethical 
Decision-Making: Ethical Theory,  Casuistry and Consultation. (Diss., U of 
Guelph)
Davis, Dena S. (1992).  "Abortion in Jewish Thought: A Study in Casuistry." 
Journal of the American  Academy of Religion, Vol. 60, pp. 313–324.
Degrazia, David (1992). "Moving  Forward in Bioethical Theory: Theory, 
Cases, and Specified Principilism."  Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 
17, pp. 511–539.
DeMarco, Joseph P.  (1991). "The Abuse of Casuistry." Southwest Philosophy 
Review, Vol. 7, pp.  17–30.
Downie, R. (1992). "Health Care Ethics and Casuistry." Journal of  Medical 
Ethics, Vol. 18, pp. 61–62, 66.
Drane, J.F. (1990). "Methodologies  for Clinical Ethics." Bulletin of the 
Pan American Health Organization, Vol. 24,  pp. 394–404.
Dworkin, R.B. (1994). "Emerging Paradigms in Bioethics:  Symposium." 
Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 69, pp. 945–1122.
Elliot, Carl (1992).  "Solving the Doctor's Dilemma?" New Scientist, Vol. 
133, pp. 42–43.
Emanuel,  Ezekiel J. (1991). The Ends of Human Life: Medical Ethics in a 
Liberal Polity  (Cambridge).
Franklin, James (2001). The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and  
Probability Before Pascal (Johns Hopkins), ch. 4.
Gaffney, James (1990). "The  Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral 
Reasoning." America, pp.  467–468.
Gallagher, Lowell (1991). Medusa's Gaze: Casuistry and Conscience in  the 
Renaissance (Stanford)
Gaul, Al (1995). "Casuistry, Care, Compassion, and  Ethics Data Analysis." 
ANS Advance Nursing Science, Vol. 17, pp.  47–57.
Green, Bryan S. (1988). Literary Methods and Sociological Theory: Case  
Studies of Simmel and Weber (Albany)
Hoffmaster, B. (1994). "The Forms and  Limits of Medical Ethics." Social 
Science and Medicine, Vol. 39, pp.  1155–64.
Hoose, Bernard (1991). "The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral  
Reasoning." Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 17, pp. 221–222.
Houle, Martha  Marie (1983). The Fictions of Casuistry and Pascal's Jesuit 
in "Les  Provinciales" (Diss. U California, San Diego)
Hunter, Michael (1993).  "Casuistry in Action: Robert Boyle's Confessional 
Interviews with Gilbert Burnet  and Edward Stillingfleet." Journal of 
Ecclesiastical History, Vol. 44, pp.  80–99.
Hunter, Kathryn Montgomery (1989). "A Science of Individuals: Medicine  and 
Casuistry." Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 14, pp.  193–220.
Jonsen, Albert R. (1991). "American Moralism and the Origin of  Bioethics 
in the United States." Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, pp.  113–130.
Jonsen, Albert R. (1986). "Casuistry and Clinical Ethics."  Theoretical 
Medicine, Vol. 7, pp. 65–74.
Jonsen, Albert R. (1986).  "Casuistry" in J.F. Childress and J. Macgvarrie, 
eds. Westminster Dictionary of  Christian Ethics (Philadelphia)
Jonsen, Albert R. (1991). "Casuistry as  Methodology in Clinical Ethics." 
Theoretical Medicine, pp. 295–307.
Jonsen,  Albert R. (1991). "Of Balloons and Bicycles; or, The Relationship 
Between  Ethical Theory and Practical Judgment." Hastings Center Report, pp. 
 14–16.
Jonsen, Albert R. and Stephen Toulmin (1988). The Abuse of Casuistry:  A 
History of Moral Reasoning (California).
Keenan, James F., S.J. (1989).  "The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral 
Reasoning." Theological Studies,  Vol. 50, pp. 390–392.
Keenan, James F., S.J. and Thomas A. Shannon. (1995).  The Context of 
Casuistry (Washington).
Kemp, Kenneth W. (1989). "The Abuse of  Casuistry: A History of Moral 
Reasoning." Ethics, Vol. 99, pp. 945–966.
Kirk,  K. (1936). Conscience and Its Problems, An Introduction to Casuistry 
 (London)
Klinefelter, Donald S. (1990). "How is Applied Philosophy to Be  Applied?" 
Journal of Social Philosophy, pp. 16–26.
Kopelman, Loretta M.  (1994). "Case Method and Casuistry: The Problem of 
Bias." Theoretical Medicine,  Vol. 15, pp. 21–37.
Kopelman, Loretta M. (1990). "What is Applied About  'Applied' Philosophy?" 
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 15, pp.  199–218.
Kuczewski, Mark G. (1994). "Casuistry and Its Communitarian  Critics." 
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, Vol. 4, pp. 99–116.
Kuczewski,  Mark G. (1994). Fragmentation and Consensus in Contemporary 
Neo-Aristotelian  Ethics: A Study in Communitarianism and Casuistry (Diss., 
Duquesne  U).
Leites, E. (1988). ed. Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe  
(Cambridge).
Leites, E. (1974). "Conscience, Casuistry, and Moral Decision:  Some 
Historical Perspectives." Journal of Chinese Philosophy, Vol. 2, pp.  41–58.
Long, Edward LeRoy, junior (1954). Conscience and Compromise: an  Approach 
to Protestant Casuistry (Philadelphia, Penn.: Westminster  Press)
MacIntyre, Alasdair (1990). "The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of  Moral 
Reasoning." Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. XXVIII, pp.  634–635.
MacIntyre, Alasdair (1984). "Does Applied Ethics Rest on a Mistake?"  
Monist, Vol. 67, pp. 498–513.
Mackler, Aaron Leonard. Cases of Judgments in  Ethical Reasoning: An 
Appraisal of Contemporary Casuistry and Holistic Model for  the Mutual Support 
of 
Norms and Case Judgments (Diss., Georgetown  U).
Macpherson-Smith, M. (1994). "Anchor and Course for the Modern Ship of  
Casuistry." Cambridge Quarterly Healthcare Ethics, Vol. 3, pp.  391–402.
Mahowald, Mary B. (1994). "Collaboration and Casuistry: A Peircean  
Pragmatic for the Clinical Setting." in Herman Parret, ed. Peirce and Value  
Theory 
(Amsterdam).
McCready, Amy R. (1992). "Milton's Casuistry: The Case of  'The Doctrine 
and Discipline of Divorce.' " Journal of Medieval and Renaissance  Studies, 
Vol. 22, pp. 393–428.
Miles, Steven H. (1989). "The Abuse of  Casuistry." JAMA, Vol. 262, pp. 961–
962.
Miller, Richard B. (1989). "On  Transplanting Human Fetal Tissue: 
Presumptive Duties and the Task of Casuistry."  Journal of Medicine and 
Philosophy, 
Vol. 14, pp. 617–624.
Murray, Thomas H.  (1994). "Medical Ethics, Moral Philosophy and Moral 
Tradition." in K.W.M.  Fulford, ed. Medicine and Moral Reasoning (New York).
Murray, Thomas H.  (1993). "Moral Reasoning in Social Context." Journal of 
Social Issues, Vol. 49,  pp. 185–199.
Odozor, Paulinus Ikechukwu (1989). Richard A. McCormick and  Casuistry: 
Moral Decision-Making in Conflict Situations (M.A. Thesis, St.  Michael's 
College).
Pack, Rolland W. (1988). Case Studies and Moral  Conclustions: The 
Philosophical Use of Case Studies in Biomedical Ethics (Diss.,  Georgetown U).
Pascal, Blaise (1967). The Provincial Letters  (London).
Peach, Lucinda Joy (1994). "Feminist Cautions About Casuistry."  Policy 
Studies, Vol. 57, pp. 143–160.
Río Parra, Elena del (2008).  Cartografías de la conciencia española en la 
Edad de Oro (Mexico).
Rudy,  Kathy (1994). "Thinking Through the Ethics of Abortion." Theology 
Today, Vol.  51, pp. 235–249.
Seiden, Melvin (1990). Measure for Measure: Casuistry and  Artistry 
(Washington).
Sichol, Marcia, S.H.C.J. (1992). "Women and the New  Casuistry." Thought, 
Vol. 67, pp. 148–157.
Singer, Marcus G. (1980). "Is  Ethics a Science: Ought it to Be?" Zygon, 
Vol. 15, pp. 29–42.
Smith, David H.  (1991). "Stories, Values, and Patient Care Decisions." in 
Charles Conrad, ed.  The Ethical Nexus: Values in Organizational Decision 
Making. (New  Jersey).
Sobel, Jordan Howard (1985). "Everyone's Conforming to a Rule."  
Philosophical Studies, Vol. 48, pp. 375–387.
Spohn, William C. (1993). "The  Magisterium and Morality." Theological 
Studies, Vol. 54, pp. 95–111.
Starr,  G. (1971). Defoe and Casuistry (Princeton).
Strong, Carson (1988).  "Justification in Ethics" in Baruch Brody, ed. 
Moral Theory and Moral Judgment  in Medical Ethics (Dordrecht).
Tallmon, James Michael (2001). "Casuistry" in  The Encyclopedia of 
Rhetoric. Ed. Thomas O. Sloane. New York: Oxford University  Press, pp. 83–88.
Tallmon, James Michael (1993). Casuistry and the Quest for  Rhetorical 
Reason: Conceptualizing a Method of Shared Moral Inquiry (Diss., U of  
Washington).
Tallmon, James Michael (1994). "How Jonsen Really Views  Casuistry: A Note 
on the Abuse of Father Wildes." Journal of Medicine and  Philosophy, Vol. 
19, pp. 103–113.
Taylor, Richard (1984). Good and Evil – A  New Direction: A Foreceful 
Attack on the Rationalist Tradition in Ethics  (Buffalo).
Thomasma, David C. (1994). "Clinical Ethics as Medical  Hermeneutics." 
Theoretical Medicine, Vol. 15, pp. 93–111.
Tomlinson, Tom  (1994). "Casuistry in Medical Ethics: Rehabilitated, or 
Repeat Offender?"  Theoretical Medicine, Vol. 15, pp. 5–20.
Toulmin, Stephen (1982). "How  Medicine Saved the Life of Ethics." 
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Vol.  25, pp. 736–750.
Toulmin, Stephen (1988). "The Recovery of Practical  Philosophy." The 
American Scholar, Vol. 57, pp. 337–352.
Toulmin, Stephen  (1981). "The Tyranny of Principles." Hastings Center 
Report, Vol. 11, pp.  31–39.
Van Der Steen, William J., and Bert Musschenga (1992). "The Issue of  
Generality in Ethics." Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. 26, pp.  511–524.
Walton, Douglas N. (1990). "Courage, Relativism and Practical  Reasoning." 
Philosophia, Vol. 20, pp. 227–240.
Warnick, Barbara. "The Abuse  of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning." 
Philosophy and Rhetoric, Vol. 24,  pp. 76–80.
Watson, Robert N. (1992). "Measure for Measure: Casuistry and  Artistry." 
Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 43, pp. 242–244.
Weinstein, Bruce  David (1989). The Possibility of Ethical Expertise (Diss. 
Georgetown  U).
Weston, Anthony (1984). "Drawing Lines: The Abortion Perplex and the  
Presuppositions of Applied Ethics." Monist, Vol. 67, pp. 589–604.
Wildes,  Kevin Wm., S.J. (1990). "The Priesthood of Bioethics and the 
Return of  Casuistry." Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 18, pp. 33–49.
Wildes,  Kevin Wm., S.J. (1993). The View for Somewhere: Moral Judgment in 
Bioethics  (Diss. Rice U).
Winston, Morton (1990). "Ethics Committee Simulations."  Teaching 
Philosophy, pp. 127–140.
Zacker, David J. (1991). Reflection and  Particulars: Does Casuistry Offer 
Us Stable Beliefs About Ethics? (M.A. Thesis,  Western Michigan U).
Zaner, Richard M. (1993). "Voices and Time: The Venture  of Clinical 
Ethics." Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 18, pp.  9–31


------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: