Lawrence Helm wrote: "So now that you've exposed and humiliated me as not being a David Bowie listener ..." Speaking for myself, I had no intention of humiliating Lawrence. I was merely adding to the poem's context. Lawrence, you see too much of the world in terms of being either right or wrong. There certainly are situations where there is either a right or wrong answer, but to quote the Philosopher, "It is the mark of an educated man to seek as much precision in things of a given genus as their nature allows." Sincerely, Phil Enns Toronto, ON I was partially exasperated because I never heard David Bowie's music but also because I couldn't make this new information fit my theory of David Ritchie's poem. I would like to see someone else analyze that poem. My "exposed and humiliated" was not seriously meant. As an example of how I never see in black and white, here is a poem I wrote this morning as a sort of . . . Knowing slipping into something else She turned back and the wind Caught her scarf and whipped It about her shoulders And the solemnity of her eyes Seeing me as leaving her, As she looked that one last time, The end of all things said. And although I thought I knew (The incipient burgeoning speaks As though he knows) it is never Reasonable to suppose one is able To propose the thing later bound And sealed and flung upon the stairs Which when opened will reveal What one never really knew - Her lovely eyes closed As she turned and stood, Giving me one last chance To rush to her side and turn Her with my hands and voice Into the beauty I knew was slipping away.