My primary source for the argument that Islamism is Fascist came from Youssef M. Choueiri's Islamic Fundamentalism, but others have drawn the same, obvious, conclusion without having gone into the matter in such depth. Fascism involves a tyranny, the suppression of free speech, freedom of the press, freedom to oppose the tyranny in elections or free speech. Fascist nations are military states that regulate the behavior of a disarmed populace. You say you are an Islamist, but what does that mean to you? I agree there are different Islamist positions. The earliest was probably the Wahhabi, the Saudi Wahhabis claim to distance themselves, at least officially, by calling themselves Salafists. The most prominent Islamist ideology grew out of the Egyptian Muslim Brothers. While Al Banna was the biggest name initially, Sayyid Qutb became the most influential ideologue and it is Qutb that Choueiri sees as most clearly Fascist in ideology. A different sort of Islamism arose in India and later Pakistan with Maududi, a Sunni predecessor of Qutb. Qutb borrowed considerably from Maududi, but Qutb honed the Jihad and is Islamism is the most troublesome today. Maududi Islamists in Pakistan can adhere to the Sharia in a Fundamentalist way and not take Qutb's urging into a war of the world Jihad, but the lines have become indistinct. Ruhollah Khomeini's career paralleled Qutb's but Khomeini achieved the first Islamist state in 1979. His teachings were consistent with those of Qutb's. Khomeini believed in exporting the Islamist Revolution. He attempted it in Bahrain which was 80% Shiite and failed. He then concentrated upon Lebanon with greater success. His actual Revolution has not achieved what he wanted outside of Iran, and inside he died before he could solidify his gains. The chief means of exportation is the Army of God, the Hezbollah. As with Qutb's Sunni Islamism, the aim is to terrorize the infidel and Islamic enemies. At its most benign (if there is such a thing), a Salafist Islamist would adhere to the Sharia in a Fundamentalist way. He would not be interested in integrating into a European pluralism. He wants to be accepted as he is, but he doesn't accept European culture or beliefs. You mentioned the different Islamic cultures, and this is true, but the Islamist influence is apparent in each. If the Turkish military didn't step in from time to time, Ataturk's dream would be replaced by an Islamist Tyranny. Iran under Khomeini set up a Republic, but the Pasdaran is always ready to keep the peace and suppress opposition. Iran is the most virulent supporter of terrorist organizations today. Pakistan like Turkey could have a nuclear Islamist tyranny if Musharraf were to be assassinated. Egypt is attempting to be an enlightened dictatorship but it persecutes its writers and doesn't condone behavior antithetical to Islamism. Raymond William Baker wrote Islam without Fear, Egypt and the New Islamists, but his new Islamists sound very like the old ones to me. As to Bosnian Islamism, I gather it hasn't caught on there quite to the extent that the exporters of Islamism hoped. As to Danish Islamism, it has at least suffered a setback. And so, Omar, what sort of Islamist are you? Lawrence -----Original Message----- From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Omar Kusturica Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 10:02 AM To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Guardian Unlimited: Denmark's new values L.H.: What is happening in Europe hasn't surprised those of us who have been closely following Islamism. *This assertion strikes me as self-important. Frankly, anyone who has been reading the newspapers or just watching the TV for some time is not surprised by almost anything any more. Islamism is essentially Fascist and in Europe as elsewhere Islamists believe in Islam uber alles. If they are Islamists then they don't believe in integrating into a European culture. *I object to your generalizations about Islamists. There are very different opinions among Islamists including liberal, Marxist, conservative, radical, pro-Western, anti-Western etc, democratic, authoritatian etc. I don't know of any branch of Islamism that thoroughly subscribes to Nazi or Fascist ideas on the European model, but some have been influenced by them. I am sorry that your extensive reading about Islamism has not apparently given you any greater sophistication about the subject. They retain practices normative for Islamists. This would apply to Islamists who immigrated to Europe (and since they are regularly being chased from Middle Eastern nations they antagonize, there are plenty of them looking for new homes) and those who convert to Islamism while in Europe. *There are also Muslims born in Europe, Lawrence. I count myself among them. I also consider myself an Islamist, but I don't find that your characterizations of Islamists are applicable to me. The liberal idea that we can all be just one big happy multicultural hymn to joy was never achievable. The Islamists think they have the better culture, better laws, better ideals, and they are firmly convinced that they have free passes to paradise while the atheistic European infidel is destined for hell. *The same of course applies to their counter-parts in the West. Frankly I don't think that the conflict is about culture, it's really about political ideas and interests. Islamism is not even a coherent political ideology, still less is it tied to a particular culture. (Remainder: Bosnia, Turkey, Egypt, Iran and Indonesia have very different cultures.) O.K. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html