[lit-ideas] Degrees of Belief

  • From: Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 09:38:50 -0500 (EST)

And indeed, desire.
 
In a message dated 12/7/2013 7:19:23 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
phil.enns@xxxxxxxxx writes:
It seems to me that beliefs about beliefs are  just other beliefs, and
have no special powers to either legitimize or  de-legitimize other
beliefs. I may believe that my beliefs have some special  quality,
given either by God or Reason or Facts, but that doesn't change  my
other beliefs in any way. Either they get the job done or they  don't.
 
In "Method in Philosophical Psychology", Grice attempts to track two  
issues: incorrigibility and privileged access -- he is trying to see how his  
approach supersedes Witters's.
 
Grice comes up with a belief-indexing. Since his approach applies to belief 
 AND DESIRES, he uses a variable:
 
ψ
 
He also uses "√" for radix. I.e. the radix can be:
 
"The door is closed"
 
If you believe it, you write
 
ψ√p
 
if you DESIRE that the door be closed you write
 
ψ'√p
 
i.e. a different psychological attitude, with the same radix.
 
Now, as to P. Enns:
 
"It seems to me that beliefs about beliefs are just other beliefs,  and
have no special powers to either legitimize or de-legitimize  other
beliefs."
 
Not for Grice. Here his indexing is applied
 
He uses
 
ψ√p
 
for 
 
U believes that p.
 
If U believes that he believes that p, Grice writes this as
 

ψ2√p
 
which is short for
 
ψ√ψ√p
 
Grice holds that, ceteris paribus, if U believes that p, he believes that  
he believes that p

ψ√p ⊃ ψ2√p
 
Since now we can apply the same principle to the consequent of the above we 
 get that 

ψ√p ⊃ ψn√p
 
where 'n' is any degree of belief.
 
While the subject-matter indicates 'degrees of BELIEF', and which only  
applies to rational 'pirots', as Grice calls them (after Carnap, "Pirots  
carulize elatically"), it also holds for desires:
 
If a pirots wants not to smoke, he also wants to want NOT to smoke, and  
wants to want to want not to smoke. 
 
Any 'missing link' or broken link in this chain results in 'akrasia', or  
weakness. Weakness can be of the will, as in "I see the best things but 
follow  the worst" (after the Latin adage), but also of the belief, as in 
perhaps 
a  variation of Pierre's puzzle introduced by Phatic: "I believe that it is 
 raining, but won't believe that I believe this".
 
And so on.
 
Cheers,
 
Speranza
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: