[lit-ideas] Re: Big Army versus Special Forces
- From: "Lawrence Helm" <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:33:16 -0800
Hey, Hey, Hey, Eric!
California isn't just California. Yeah, sure it votes Democratic every
time, but not by 100% -- more like 60%, and the rest of us, we 40% number
more than most of the rest of the states in the Union. That ought to count
for something. Besides that, we 40% represent 100% of those willing to
fight in California; so in the anarchic scenario you and Mike are
discussing, we are sure to quickly take control of California and send all
the Leftists further West - unless you want them in that "Conservative"
State you live in.
Lawrence
San Jacinto,
California (Yeah, it's a Leftist state, but at least it ain't got no fellah
named Hillary as Senator)
-----Original Message-----
From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Eric Yost
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 11:47 AM
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Big Army versus Special Forces
Mike replying to Brain: If we had no army at all, I wonder
what would happen?
Invasion and conquest by countries with armies. Local
occupation armies fighting small groups of ex-hunter,
ex-police and ex-military insurgents in the forests.
Destruction of free press and imposed military censorship.
Relocation camps. Slave armies. Destruction of libraries.
Somewhat like Iraq only much worse. Somewhat like China
under the Japanese. Somewhat like France under the Vichy.
Sort of like California only faster.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
