[lit-ideas] Behind the visible there must be something, it must be invisible, behind that what?

From: Donal McEvoy <donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:18:34 +0000 (GMT)

For "visible", substitute "observable" [a la _LdF_].

Behind "what", substitute "what, and so on behind that what"?


Donal

Clearly a question beyond many





------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

References:
- [lit-ideas] Examples from Argentina
  - From: Lawrence Helm

Other related posts:

» [lit-ideas] Behind the visible there must be something, it must be invisible, behind that what? - Donal McEvoy