Mike, I'm just wondering. How do you explain why there have been an estimated 50,000 wars since history began, with war becoming progressively more destructive? Lawrence has been honest enough to admit that this particular war that?s being contemplated is essentially a blinking contest. We won't blink first, even if we have to blow up the world. Lawrence supplies philosophical bases for war. If that?s the case, why are we not petitioning the U.N. to outlaw philosophy? If not philosophy, then what? Here we are, the most advanced civilization in the history of the world, getting ready to use nuclear weapons because we don't want to be the first ones to blink. How?s this for an analogy: you're in a supermarket and there?s an unruly customer ahead of you in line. The unruly customer begins to holler, clerk calls management, unruly customer says he has a bomb in his car, management goes and gets an AK47 and blows the unruly customer away and the surrounding 20 people, including the clerk, to stop the customer from getting the bomb he said he had. Mission accomplished, the store is safe from the bomb that customer said he had. Is this emotional? Philosophical? Logical? Insane? Not enough/too much sex? What do you think? Why 50,000 wars that get worse and worse culminating now in nuclear exchanges? ----- Original Message ----- From: Mike Geary To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: 4/27/2006 12:18:54 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Tune in and turn off JK: I'm getting this urge for you guys to all define "feel" and "emotion" for me........ No problem. Emotions are what men don't have, which is why men suffer from emotional envy. The science is uncertain on this but the consensus generally is that emotions are produced in the breasts, which explains why men are so deficient. However, even men have feelings. Usually of the hurt sort. Men get their feelings hurt very easily. When a man gets undressed and the woman says: "Is that all there is?" A man's feelings get hurt. But usually men just feel tired or worn out or listless or hungover, feelings often wrongly ascribed to laziness. When men are lazy it's because they're feeling put upon. That's a quite different feeling from feeling lazy. No one feels lazy, but many a guy has asked himself: "Why should I have to take out the garbage? She has two arms, two legs, two eyes. I need to watch this game." Laziness is a form of self-justification which arises out of a feeling of being put upon. Men also feel stupid sometimes, or rather, often they do. And with some justification as many will tell you. They are especially stupid around women and frequently stare at their breasts hoping to be inspired by some higher emotion than what they're feeling, but it never happens. Pigs to the end are men. Sometimes men know what their feeling. Especially when it comes to hate and envy and getevenfulness and lasciviousness. Especially lasciviousness. Men are right on when it comes to lasciviousness. Emotions like "love" don't cloud their vision. Emotions leave women weak in the world. Men walk all over them, and some of them like it. Women are so confused in their emotions, putting up with men that beat them because they think "he loves me" -- it's all due to their breasts pumping out all those emotions right and left. Who could stand to be a woman? How do they ever get anything done with all those emotions crowding out rational thought and poking out their breasts? I hope this helps, Julie. Mike Geary breast admirer of Memphis