Simon Poole wrote: > > The constants proposed by Sanit are basically the same as the ones I use > in my user-space calibration. Mine are tested with 6" touchscreens from > two different manufacturers. > > IMHO, they are much better defaults than 0x0 and 0xfff. > OK - consider them applied > In terms of configurability, is there no standard IOCTL for supplying ts > calibration constants to kernel drivers? I believe hh.org use one > called TS_SET_CAL, but I'm not very familiar with their stuff. > If the new defaults are OK we can keep it, else I'll have to insist on some kind of "proper solution" that is configurable, the next time someone suggests to change them.