Michael Burian wrote: > touchscreen: > Seems like the constants you've patched are configuration data, > right? > > If yes, we should make it Kconfig-ureable > If no, we need to decide if the current constants are broken. > > If they are broken ==> fix them > If the are not broken ==> keep them The constants proposed by Sanit are basically the same as the ones I use in my user-space calibration. Mine are tested with 6" touchscreens from two different manufacturers. IMHO, they are much better defaults than 0x0 and 0xfff. In terms of configurability, is there no standard IOCTL for supplying ts calibration constants to kernel drivers? I believe hh.org use one called TS_SET_CAL, but I'm not very familiar with their stuff. -- Simon Poole www.appliancestudio.com