[linux-avc2210k] Re: Success with latest adaptec (v1.3) firmware
- From: Dr J A Gow <J.A.Gow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: linux-avc2210k@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:25:09 +0100
Very nice! Thanks for that. I am going to add it to the development tree
and in the next few days release an update with this README included.
John.
On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 17:33 +0100, j t wrote:
> On 4/6/07, Dr J A Gow <J.A.Gow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 11:20 +0100, j t wrote:
> > > On 4/4/07, Dr J A Gow <J.A.Gow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > If you, or anyone else would like to volunteer to help to write
> > > > some
> > > > decent docs for this driver, please feel free. I would welcome it and
> > > > the docs would certainly be distributed with the package.
> > >
> > > Willl do. Is the behaviour of your "unstable development tree"
> > > sufficiently close to that of the last stable release to mean that the
> > > same documentation would apply equally well to both? (if not, could
> > > you please send me a copy of your latest?)
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for the offer - it's much appreciated.
>
> John,
>
> As promised, please find attached a possible README for the driver.
> Please feel free to hack it to pieces as you feel fit.
>
> It's also worth noting that there are 3 parts of the README which
> could be deleted once the driver has been updated:
>
> a) modifying the offsets in /etc/multiload.conf for the new 1.3 firmware, and
> b) modifying the path to the multiload executable in
> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-multiload.rules
> c) creation of /etc/udev/rules.d/70-avc2210k.rules
>
> (In fact, there's also the bit about the creation of the "extra"
> folder in /lib/modules/<ver>, but that would require a reworking of
> the makefile).
>
> HTH, Jaime :-)
Other related posts:
