[LRflex] Re: Using R lenses on digital bodies..AN EXIF COMMENT.

  • From: Michiel Fokkema <michiel.fokkema@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:27:13 +0100

No, it will just say 2.0 for any setting. That's all.
Without a chip it will just say -. Although there are now adapters with 
chips that can be programmed to give you the widest aperture of yourlens 
and the focal lenght. I have one of these but didn't bother to program it.
I've tried the chipped adapters but couldn't find an advantage.
Focusing is better with the eye and with flash it is even a disadvantage.

Cheers,

Michiel Fokkema
-------------------------
Fokkema Fotografie
www.michielfokkema.com
michiel.fokkema@xxxxxxxxx
+31(0)615569576

Steve Barbour wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2010, at 11:30 AM, Michiel Fokkema wrote:
> 
>> Get the precision screen for your 5d2. It will make manual focusing s 
>> lot easier.
>> An adapter without a chip will not set any aperture on the camera.An 
>> adapter with a chip will.
> 
> 
> really ? with R lenses, it will communicate to a Canon body and set the 
> proper aperture correction?
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
>> I don't have much trouble with wrong exposures with my Leica or olympus 
>> lenses. But I do not stop down further then one or two stops.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Michiel Fokkema
>> -------------------------
>> Fokkema Fotografie
>> www.michielfokkema.com
>> michiel.fokkema@xxxxxxxxx
>> +31(0)615569576
>>
>> Herman Kempers wrote:
>>> hi Aram, Richard and all
>>> I'm  new in the adapterworld- just recently thinking of using some R lenses 
>>> on my 5dII 
>>> There are some reasons to do this, and some to give it a second thought.    
>>>                                                                             
>>>              R  lenses have a lot of quality ; the way they are built, 
>>> their size and weight (compared to the fast Canon L lenses ) their image 
>>> quality (although, when it comes to absolute sharpness/resolution on HiRes 
>>> digicams I have my doubts, but for me and hopefully most people, image 
>>> quality is more than just resolution...) and something trivial like 'a 
>>> feeling'.                                                               And 
>>> not to forget MF. Manual Focus with AF lenses works much different then 
>>> with a pure MF lens. I like to focus manual.
>>> The second thoughts are for the use of an adapter;  does it focus on 
>>> infity, is the lens not wobling on the body, by the lack of good screens 
>>> (Canon) hard to focus and the mentioned exposure corrections you should 
>>> make.                                                             And it is 
>>> a little 'unnatural' /artificial -what's the proper English word for this?? 
>>> . Richard was right on all his points, and very right on the point that 
>>> with R we use lenses from the analogue/chemical era on a camera designed 
>>> for digital /electronic photography. This causes some communication 
>>> problems, which can be solved by a little thinking, so working a little 
>>> slower.  For me not a problem, I use mainly an exposuremeter when working 
>>> digital.                                                                    
>>>                                           Working digital is for my 
>>> business, R5 + film is for fun. (BTW this weekend bought a R4s and R3 
>>> mot.body :-)) love on first sight.
>>> As far I understand the problem mentioned by Aram is that Canon does not 
>>> recognize the lens and sets to a default which probally is  f 2.0  So every 
>>> lens, regardless it's real full opening, attached with an adapter, the 
>>> Canon exposuremeter willl think aperture open is 2.0          (Yes this is 
>>> strange, funny and silly)                                                   
>>>                                                             So attaching a 
>>> 4.0 lens the exposure is 2 stops overexposed. The programwork mentioned by 
>>> Aram and Richard as a possible solution may work, but I stick to an 
>>> exposure meter........
>>> My choice: As Canon has no alterative for a wider angle than the 1,4 /24 ( 
>>> First L lens then is a 14 mm- or the 17 Tilt & Shift . I never use 
>>> zoomlenses)   my Elmarit 19 mm is the ideal focal length (second version, 
>>> so mirror problems-hesitate to make it fit) For the use of the 60 Macro 
>>> only the adapter is needed. (and  some thinking) Too bad there will be no 
>>> R10..........
>>> and thank you Richard for your note on the EXIF....
>>> herman
>>>
>>> ------
>>> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>>>   http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
>>> Archives are at:
>>>    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>> ------
>> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>>   http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
>> Archives are at:
>>    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
> 
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>    http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
>     //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
   http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: