[LRflex] Re: RAW vs JPEG fine?
- From: Ed Willoughby <ed_willoughby@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
My two cents ...
Once you see the difference first hand, you will use go to your RAW file for
better prints and images. Personally, I use both because sometimes I don't
want to spend the time on images that just need to be good and not really good
(have yet to make a perfect one! I do try).
JPEGs - I use the Auto Correct, a little sharper etc.... (probably like most
photogs)
RAW - Have a set of developing features that work for me and then fiddle with a
few until I like the result - click develop or save.
Bye now. Ed.
--- On Mon, 4/27/09, Steve Barbour <kididdoc@xxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Steve Barbour <kididdoc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [LRflex] RAW vs JPEG fine?
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, April 27, 2009, 9:15 AM
On Apr 27, 2009, at 5:28 AM, Sonny Carter wrote:
I was a late comer to raw, but I'm totally convinced that raw is like negative
and fine jpeg is like transparency.
If you like to gamble, use jpeg.
I agree.
I have been shooting RAW/and fine jpeg bw, together, so I have the negative,
see the color, and the bw...am sometimes very positively surprised by the
quality look of the bw ...
but then if I want bw, I retrieve it and even better from the RAW file.
Comments appreciated, What do you think?
Steve
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Alex Hurst <corkflor@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all.
I know this is a hoary old chestnut, but a reiteration of your views for the
benefit of a tyro would be much appreciated
I've just acquired a very nice ex-demo black M8 body which comes with Capture
One, not to mention the full Leica Passport. It's now mated to my Nocti, which
is probably my M8 lens of choice most of the time.
As I'm a Mac man, I tend to use iPhoto as my main photo library, and edit in
Photoshop.
To date with my Nikon D200 I've been very happy with the quality of the fine
JPEGs (printing to a maximum size of A4), and haven't even dabbled in RAW.
But, as Capture One appears to be highly-rated, is it really worth learning its
ins and outs to extract ultimate quality from the M8 in RAW, or should I stick
to fine JPEGs and my usual routine as with the Nikon?
I emphasise that I'm not going to be producing huge exhibition prints, and the
M8, like the Nikon, seems to produce 10Mb files in fine JPEG mode.
With my current set-up, editing is very quick. I have the impression that RAW
is a lot more time-consuming, but I may be mistaken.
What do you guys do and why?
Best of light.
Alex
--
Alex & Carmel Hurst
Waterfall
Near Cork
Ireland
Tel: +353 21 454 3328
Mobile: +353 87 245 7048 (A)
+353 87 988 9927 (C)
email: corkflor@xxxxxx (for either of us)
Carmel McCarthy <carmelmac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (for Carmel personally)
UK email (when there) corkflor.2@xxxxxxxxxx
Home Pages: http://www.iol.ie/~corkflor
Photo Gallery at: http://corkflor.smugmug.com
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
--
Regards,
Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
Natchitoches, Louisiana (+31.754164,-093.099080)
USA
Other related posts:
