Perhaps it is the noise reduction. The light was bright enough around the moon
(flair??) so you do not see the noise, but outside that are all those “stars”
which I doubt are stars at all, but sensor noise? How does that sound? The
moon is so much brighter than any stars, if you exposed for the surface detail
of the moon, you certainly would not get any stars to show up.
Aram
From: Neil Gould
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 6:54 PM
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [LRflex] Re: IMG: Last night's full moon
From: Philippe mailto:photo.philippe.amard@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [LRflex] IMG: Last night's full moon
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 23:31:32 +0200
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/Full+Moon+_+400mm-0453-2.jpg.html
<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/Full+Moon+_+400mm-0453-2.jpg.html><http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/Full+Moon+_+400mm-0453-2.jpg.html>
Amities
Philippe, still wondering about this absolute black halo around it ...
Hmm...the black halo is very curious! What resolution is the original shot? I
see that the exposure was "center weighted average", and that there's a white
ring outline on the moon, but that shouldn't explain why the halo is so large.
I wonder if there's a test shot you could take to explore this further?
Neil
[https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png]<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
Virus-free.
www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
