BINGO !
Thank you Aram, so much !
:-)
Amities
Philippe
Le 1 juil. 2018 à 05:30, Aram <leica_r8@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
Perhaps it is the noise reduction. The light was bright enough around the
moon (flair??) so you do not see the noise, but outside that are all those
“stars” which I doubt are stars at all, but sensor noise? How does that
sound? The moon is so much brighter than any stars, if you exposed for the
surface detail of the moon, you certainly would not get any stars to show up.
Aram
From: Neil Gould <>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 6:54 PM
To: <>leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [LRflex] Re: IMG: Last night's full moon
From: Philippe <>mailto:photo.philippe.amard@xxxxxxxxx ;
<mailto:photo.philippe.amard@xxxxxxxxx>Subject: [LRflex] IMG: Last night's
full moon
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 23:31:32 +0200Hmm...the black halo is very curious! What resolution is the original shot?
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/Full+Moon+_+400mm-0453-2.jpg.html
<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/Full+Moon+_+400mm-0453-2.jpg.html>
<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/Full+Moon+_+400mm-0453-2.jpg.html>
<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/Full+Moon+_+400mm-0453-2.jpg.html>
Amities
Philippe, still wondering about this absolute black halo around it ...
I see that the exposure was "center weighted average", and that there's a
white ring outline on the moon, but that shouldn't explain why the halo is so
large. I wonder if there's a test shot you could take to explore this further?
Neil
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
Virus-free. www.avg.com
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
