[LRflex] Re: Backache (revisited)
- From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@xxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 13:12:11 -0700
Hi George,
In this situation I don't see any reason not to keep quiet. He isn't
removing a significant bit of evidence as in a crime scene, nor changing
anything really significant to the image. Other than in your eyes. Cloning
out a completely out of focus
post to sand of the infield hardly warrants confessing any clone effort.
Now if he cloned in a new head on the cowboy?" Or some major aspect then
that's a whole new ball game. Then yes he has to be honest and spill the
beans he had done so.
But changing the earth of the infield? C'mon? Besides it doesn't change the
major aspect of the photograph. The cowboy and horse.
Besides in the end you and I agreed his third crop was the best as you
suggested in the first place,
cheers,
ted
-----Original Message-----
From: leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of George Lottermoser
Sent: August-03-14 11:53 AM
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [LRflex] Re: Backache (revisited)
On Aug 3, 2014, at 11:40 AM, Ted Grant wrote:
> When you do a clone of this nature? NOT BAD AT ALL! "DON'T TELL ANYONE
ABOUT IT!"
I cannot agree.
If found out after the fact.
reputation destroyed.
Best to keep it clear.
IMO
Regards,
George Lottermoser
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
