Hi Philippe, Yes it is indeed the one. Images are generally contrasty, tack sharp and have a 'sparkle like champagne'. When traveling light with the SLR, this is the lens I can depend on. The macro mode is excellent - and "bokeh" in macro mode ain't bad at all, I've taken some very contrasty and sharp flower shots. In regular mode, even at 70/4, the bokeh is only OK - that's when one says to oneself to stick to longer lenses for portraits and such. BTW Leica makes one with ROM contacts for R8/9 which costs a lot more (!)....but mine is the older version which assumably has the same optics, just without ROM contacts. Bought it used for about $700 on eBay and met the seller at a Starbucks in Hayward for local pickup about 2 years ago. I've used it a bit more than the 70X3 Angenieux ($500 eBay local pickup too). Sometimes I wonder if the minimal 5.6 f-stop, for v. good to excellent performance, is a compromise, considering you can go to 2.8 with your 35X2 Angenieux. Therefore I have been following your photo postings with interest. How is your 35X2 Angenieux wide open at 2.8, or do you have to stop down to 3.5 or 4 to optimize? Best wishes, Eric > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:48:32 +0200 > From: Philippe Amard <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [LRflex] Re: B&W of Stonehenge, & Salisbury Cathedral monochromes > > Hi Eric, > Is this the one lense you've been using? > here <http://www.imx.nl/photosite/leica/rseries/testr/ve43570.html> > I wish I had one too. > Yours > Phileicangenieux ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/