RE: January 8 meeting follow up
- From: Cheryl Hukill <chukill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "klamathsiskiyouems@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <klamathsiskiyouems@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:02:41 -0800
Our county counsel is looking into the TORT issues regarding crossing State
lines for service
From: klamathsiskiyouems-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:klamathsiskiyouems-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 3:42 PM
To: klamathsiskiyouems@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: January 8 meeting follow up
Dan,
Thank you for your work so far on this subject. Keep us posted on your
progress.
I have sent a request to Oregon's EMS division and not received a response yet.
Michael Lund
----- Original Message -----
From: Dan Spiess<mailto:dspiess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: klamathsiskiyouems@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:klamathsiskiyouems@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Eric Rudnick<mailto:erudnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ; Kara
Davis<mailto:KDavis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 2:27 PM
Subject: January 8 meeting follow up
Dear All
At the ambulance meeting in Keno on January 8 several people came away with
assignments. My assignment was to confer with the state of California EMS
Authority and our policies regarding the scope of practice that Oregon based
personnel could use when responding into California. I, along with our Medical
Director and clinical staff have had a number of discussions with the state
staff and have reviewed pertinent regulations and other documents on the
matter. This is not an easy task as there is no one size fits all answer for
all levels of training. My assignment was to be completed in two weeks. Today
marks two weeks, and while we are narrowing in on an answer, it is not
conclusive.
Please bear with me as we press forward.
Thank you for your patience. If you have specific questions, please contact me.
Dan Spiess
530 229-3979
dspiess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dspiess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Other related posts:
