Re: January 8 meeting follow up

  • From: "Michael" <mel45@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <klamathsiskiyouems@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:28:59 -0800


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Cheryl Hukill 
  To: klamathsiskiyouems@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 4:02 PM
  Subject: RE: January 8 meeting follow up

  Our county counsel is looking into the TORT issues regarding crossing State 
lines for service


  From: klamathsiskiyouems-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:klamathsiskiyouems-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael
  Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 3:42 PM
  To: klamathsiskiyouems@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: Re: January 8 meeting follow up




  Thank you for your work so far on this subject.  Keep us posted on your 


  I have sent a request to Oregon's EMS division and not received a response 


  Michael Lund

    ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Dan Spiess 

    To: klamathsiskiyouems@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

    Cc: Eric Rudnick ; Kara Davis 

    Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 2:27 PM

    Subject: January 8 meeting follow up


    Dear All


    At the ambulance meeting in Keno on January 8 several people came away with 
assignments.  My assignment was to confer with the state of California EMS 
Authority and our policies regarding the scope of practice that Oregon based 
personnel could use when responding into California.  I, along with our Medical 
Director and clinical staff have had a number of discussions with the state 
staff and have reviewed pertinent regulations and other documents on the 
matter.  This is not an easy task as there is no one size fits all answer for 
all levels of training.  My assignment was to be completed in two weeks.  Today 
marks two weeks, and while we are narrowing in on an answer, it is not 


    Please bear with me as we press forward.  


    Thank you for your patience.  If you have specific questions, please 
contact me.


    Dan Spiess

    530 229-3979





Other related posts: