I think you have to know some vi. But if you have to edit alot, you should learn emacs. I use emacs for "real editing." My uses include LaTeX (manuscripts, presentations, and posters; physics homework--I'm sure there is a vi way for adding macros (maybe you use m4 in combo with vi?), but I like having the entire greek alphabet at two key strokes away) perl and python code (the modes within emacs are great); matlab and idl modes; wiki mode, etc.. etc.. And in my experience, the emacs calc-mode is amazingly, insanely great--it is hands down the best calculator I've ever used. RPN, symbolic manipulation, yanking and pasting from LaTeX buffers, column and matrix math, and that is really just the beginning. I use vi almost daily as well, for a quick config file edit or something similar. So I'd say some time on vi, and more time on emacs... Matt On 1/31/06, deadcats <deadcats@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Being relatively new to the shell, I prefer the enchanced vim that SuSE > offers--and Gawd forgive the person mentioning Edlin...may it rot in hade= s. > ;) > -dc > > On 1/31/06, Stephen E. Bodnar <sbodnar@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > If I'm out in the shell somewhere, I always use vi. Except that > > linux distributions will often substitute an enhanced version of vi. > > > > But I agree with Jacob. Nedit is my favorite in a GUI. > > > > Stephen > > > > >I like nano. It was a free as in speech rewrite of pico. But Larry i= s > > >probably right. Vi is almost a standard on *nix machines. That being > > >said my favorite GUI text editor is nedit. > > > > > >Talley family wrote: > > > > > >>But if you are bouncing around on different Linux/Unix hosts, > > >>seems to me that vi or ed are the only things you can count > > >>on finding.... > > >> > > >>For that reason I think a student should learn vi. > > >> > > >>Eat it, its good for you. > > >> > > >>Larry > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>-----Original Message----- > > >>>From: juneau-lug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >>>[mailto:juneau-lug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin Miller > > >>>Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 6:10 PM > > >>>To: juneau-lug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >>>Subject: [juneau-lug] Re: Editors > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>Eric M. Niewoehner wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>>I am about to teach a section on editors and I was curious > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>as to which > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>>text editor you all preferred. While I am on my local > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>workstation, I > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>>always use the GUI, but shell sessions require a plain-text > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>editor. The > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>>author of the text I am using is keen on vi. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>If I'm in KDE I usually use Kate. If at the CLI, I like the midnigh= t > > >>>commander editor (if mc is installed). Otherwise I flip/flop > > >>>between vi > > >>>and pico. Not overly fluent in vi, and not overly impressed > > >>>with pico. > > >>> > > >>>Way back in the DOS days I used to use an editor called TED (Tiny > > >>>EDitor) which was a PC Mag. utility. Small, fast, and beat the pant= s > > >>>off edlin. The mc editor is similar. Best thing since sliced beer. > > >>>Um, bottled bread. Er, whatever. > > >>> > > >>>If I'm doing more than just a quick edit of a .conf file the > > >>>color and > > >>>nesting in Kate is quite handy. Don't do much scripting or > > >>>programming > > >>>so my needs are pretty humble... > > >>> > > >>>...Kevin > > >>>-- > > >>>Kevin Miller > > >>>http://www.alaska.net/~atftb > > >>>Juneau, Alaska > > > >>Registered Linux User No: 307357 -- | Matt Heavner, Assistant Professor of Physics | University of Alaska Southeast | 11120 Glacier Highway, Juneau, AK 99801 | Phone: (907) 796-6403 Fax: (907) 796-6406 | If Heisenberg was uncertain, why are you so sure? ------------------------------------ This is the Juneau-LUG mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to juneau-lug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject header.