Yes, it would appear that my little problem wasn't so isolated after all. But here's my question, and it may get me in trouble, but oh well. Shouldn't that bug have been squashed during the beta cycle? I mean, with as many people as I've seen have that particular issue, you would certainly think that FS would take steps so that type of thing doesn't happen, or if users reported it happening, they should've fixed it. Maybe my standards are too high, but I find it unacceptable that we should have to delete any files or make any modifications like that just so our screenreader, one of the most important pieces of software we use, should work without any kind of error messages all over the place. If you're a farely new computer user, or if you just don't know what to do, how can you be expected to know how to delete those 2 files like we did? Sure that's where tech support comes in, but what if you write to them and they don't contact you?
you would receive all kinds of error messages and not know how to fix them.i fully realize that every system is different, and I fully understand that it's not easy for FS to squash bugs on absolutely every system out there. But if it's a wide spread problem, I would like to see them take care of it. In fact, I would really like to see a maintanance release that fixes all kinds of long-standing issues I.e. the loads of empty virtual buffers people are seing, the issue with the s key not going to the same link on a web page, the other focus issues that happen from time to time, stuff like that. Yes, having new features is a nice thing, but what good are those features if the screenreader you're using isn't as reliable as it could be? At this point, i want a screenreader that just works and I don't need all the toys.
Just something to ponder. At 12:46 AM 3/3/2007, you wrote:
Thanks, Chris, your clear and concise steps worked like well, shall I say, "magic." Let me tell you, it was a real joy eliminating that pesky little nuisance so great post; thanks again!__________ NOD32 2091 (20070303) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. <http://www.eset.com>http://www.eset.com
-- JFW related links: JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/ Scripting mailing list: http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com JFW List instructions: To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
