-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Oh right, so we're dealing with experts here are we? I would disagree, I would suggest a patch is normally something that is installed over an existing installation to make changes, which this is not necessarily, as you don't have to have an existing 5.0 installation in place before installing the update. Alex - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Quanin" <quanin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 7:09 PM Subject: Re: Clarification update versus upgrade (was RE: New JFW Update Coming This Afternoon) In coding/programming terms, 'patch' = 'bug fix'. James At 01:35 PM 12/03/2004 -0500, you wrote: >yeah, but I wouldn't call this a patch. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Quanin" <quanin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 12:32 PM >Subject: Clarification update versus upgrade (was RE: New JFW Update >Coming This Afternoon) > > >Here's a bit of a distinguisher that, I think, helps to >differentiate betwen 'upgrade' and 'update', with regards JFW. The >installation released yesterday is simply an update, or patch, to >version 5.0. It will work using the authorisation you have currently >for that version, you need not buy another JFW program, or worry >about the status of your SMA. Think of it as simply a version of the >program released that fixes bugs in the current version. There are >not enough fixes to warrant a complete new version of JFW, or enough >new features for such. This leads to my second point. An 'upgrade' >is just that. You would be expected to, for instance, purchase a new >copy of JFW, or have the copy you install count against your SMA. >Generally, when versions of this nature are released, it's more than >just a minor fix to stability, or a few script updates, but it's >usually >implementation of a few new features at the same time, such as place >markers when the first 5.0 version came out. I hope this sort of >explains things with regard this issue. If not, feel free to talk to >me off-list. > >James > > >-- >To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to >jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject >line. > >If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the >list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the >list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >-- >To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to >jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject >line. > >If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the >list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the >list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx - -- To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQFMjeb617l94CWXgEQJxZwCffo9TFFhFPuPbUjQI0bMvFdclXf8Anjcj krMjs3XXkVkM2KEZjV79+5Ag =2boa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx