[iyonix-support] Re: USB2 on 5.16
- From: charles <charles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: iyonix-support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:42:17 +0000 (GMT)
In article <7612dff050.davehigton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Higton
<davehigton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In message <50f0bd81b1charles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> charles
> <charles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > In article <2ee7b9f050.davehigton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Higton
> > <davehigton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > In message <50f0a1d437tim@xxxxxxxxx> Tim Hill <tim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > > Is it just me or could USB behaviours be described as quirky, just
> > > > like with other OSs? USB Plug'n'pray is well renamed, particularly
> > > > when applied to stuff you leave plugged in, IME.
> >
> > > 1) There are /huge/ numbers of USB devices out there that don't
> > > conform to the various USB specifications. If you want to spend a
> > > few hours, look back over the Linux USB mailing list archive.
> >
> > > 2) Recently I had a chance to try a Panasonic Lumix camera at a
> > > meeting of SAUG. The results were:
> >
> > > Risc PC, Simtec stack: Works fine. A9Home, Simtec stack: The
> > > configuration descriptor is returned as all 0. Iyonix, Castle stack:
> > > Crashes the USB stack.
> >
> > Just rechecked since going to 5.16: My Lumix FZ-20 works quite happily
> > in my Iyonix USB port.
> In what sense does it work? Does it implement the mass storage protocol?
It works in the sense that I can click on the icon, see the files and
download them into my Iyonix. I can also delete them from the camera if I
want to. That's enough, I think.
--
From KT24
Using a RISC OS computer running v5.16
---
To alter your preferences or leave the group,
visit //www.freelists.org/list/iyonix-support
Other info via //www.freelists.org/webpage/iyonix-support
Other related posts:
