In article <86514f6c52.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Martin Wuerthner <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In message <526c3a8e7ftim@xxxxxxxxx> Tim Hill <tim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In article <4F561061.9010908@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, David J. Ruck > > <druck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 06/03/2012 10:40, Learning Partners wrote: > >>> I think that next time a change this radical in the OS occurs > >> It isn't a radical change, it's a point release the same as many > >> others. > > I think what is meant is that from a users perspective perhaps it > > _is_ a radical change when it means something that worked now doesn't. > According to that definition even the tiniest OS change would have to > be called "radical". Not necessarily. Only a minor change that has (for the user) a major outcome could be seen as radical. I should have said: YMMV. [Snip] -- Tim Hill .............................................................. www.timil.com --- To alter your preferences or leave the group, visit //www.freelists.org/list/iyonix-support Other info via //www.freelists.org/webpage/iyonix-support List-related queries to iyonix-support-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx