*shucks* can you tell im not doing any work today :) Greg ________________________________ From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wed 15/10/2003 10:14 AM To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List] Subject: [isalist] Re: Interesting Article Found In Linux Users & Developer AD: Get Thawte's New Step-by-Step SSL Guide for MSIIS: http://www.isaserver.org/thawte/ Hi Ray, Nice analysis and I especially appreciate the kind words about the list. The ISAServer.org Web site and boards are the same way. Lots of people there helping other people and flames are almost non-existant. I think if you have a primarily MS shop, and if you need to allow remote access to MS network services (Exchange, Sharepoint, VPN, etc) then ISA is the ideal firewall, whether its at the edge of the departmental LAN, or the edge of the entire network. If there is one thing that limits its overall general appeal is its LAT based architecture. However, if you practice good defense in depth, this is almost a non-issue. You're right about mixed environments. The firewall client is one of the most compelling reasons to use ISA because it gives you the greatest flexibility and control. The firewall client is also completely transparent and has never broken a single app I know of. However, DNS resolution issues are a real problem for those who don't understand them and the firewall client is dependent on name resolution. All in all, I like ISA and I like the people who work with it :-) Thanks! Tom www.isaserver.org/shinder -----Original Message----- From: Ray Dzek [mailto:rdzek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:35 PM To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List] Subject: [isalist] Re: Interesting Article Found In Linux Users & Developer AD: Get Thawte's New Step-by-Step SSL Guide for MSIIS: http://www.isaserver.org/thawte/ MS Hype vs. OS Hype