RE: ISAserver.org - Review of SurfControl Web Filter 5.0 for ISA Server 2004
- From: "Ball, Dan" <DBall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:50:27 -0500
Are you sure? I checked that page, and it had a good sized list of
other browsers and their signatures (of course, they are being blocked
now here).
Oh, and I just got off the phone with SurfControl, the person I was
talking to claims that the reason they can't filter SecureNAT sessions
is because they can't get a "Source IP", the ISA server hides that, so
they drop the packet from filtering. I passed on a summary of what
David said he did to fix a possible similar problem, but he didn't seem
to want to hear it.
So, since a fix from SurfControl doesn't seem to be anywhere near being
on the horizon, anyone have any ideas how to block all SecureNAT
sessions? I have no problems with "requiring" all users to use the FWC.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ara [mailto:ara@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 13:11
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] RE: ISAserver.org - Review of SurfControl Web Filter
5.0 for ISA Server 2004
http://www.ISAserver.org
Oops! I forgot to post the link
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/isa/2004/plan/commonapplica
tionsignatures.mspx
-----Original Message-----
From: Ara
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 10:07 AM
To: '[ISAserver.org Discussion List]'
Subject: RE: ISAserver.org - Review of SurfControl Web Filter 5.0 for
ISA Server 2004
Tom,
Very good choice but where can I find signatures for other browsers? I
have followed this link and it only provides IE, or can I create a rule
that client header has to be IE?
Other related posts:
