[Ilugc] fossconf-09-negative side
- From: sbharathi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Bharathi Subramanian)
- Date: Wed Mar 4 10:17:53 2009
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, varadarajan narayanan wrote:
1) NRC FOSS staff could have avoided the issue. It is like serving
mutton biriyani for poor on Gandhi jayanthi. Good intentions but
badly done.
2) LUGC members could have taken it in the stride - mentioned it but
not make an issue of it .
3) NRC FOSS representatives could have accepted the slip and assured
that they will take such things.
4) LUGC members could have avoided playing one-up on each other and
convert it to a flame war.
Thanks VN :)
I feel, this discussion is going away from the interest of the ILUGC.
Now there is no point in fighting/discussing about the mistake, which
is already happened, and asking how it happened, why, and explaining
what happened, etc., This is an opportunity to understand and correct
OUR mistakes. Move on...
STOP. Don't reply to this thread.
Bye :)
--
Bharathi S
Other related posts:
