[ibis-macro] Re: Updated Version BIRD daft
- From: Bob Ross <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: radek_biernacki@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:47:37 -0800
Radek:
We have a disgreement here. A Verson 5.2 IBIS document will document
AMI_Version 5.2 functionality.
But as long as an AMI model uses lower level functionality, an IBIS
Version 5.2 file can reference it as a lower version of IBIS-AMI. And
visa-versa. The only real IBIS command is the [Algorithmic Model] keyword
available only in IBIS Version 5.0 and above.
That way existing and new models can be used.
Bob
radek_biernacki@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Arpad,
Perhaps a better way to phrase the first statement could be:
The value of this parameters shall be a valid IBIS version greater or equal to
5.1, and shall be not be grater that the IBIS version of the IBIS file in which
the reference to this AMI file is made.
Radek
-----Original Message-----
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 11:24 AM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Updated Version BIRD daft
Hello everyone,
Here is an updated draft of the Version BIRD. (This is not posted on the ATM
web site yet).
I made a few minor editorial changes on Bob's suggestion.
There were a few suggestions in the last teleconference, but I am not
completely sure what the decision was for me.
- I thought someone suggested that there was no need o mention
version numbers at all
- I also thought someone suggested that I should remove the
sentence about the absence of this keyword meaning version 5.0.
If these two suggestions are still valid, I could remove the
paragraph:
|* The value of this parameter shall be "5.1" or greater
for
|* AMI models written in compliance with the IBIS Version
5.1 or
|* later specifications. The absence of AMI_version
indicates
|* that the AMI model was written in compliance with the
IBIS
|* Version 5.0 specification.
from the BIRD. I personally don't think it is harmful to keep it there, but I
can live with or without it.
Please let me know what you think. I would like to finalize this in today's
ATM teleconference.
Thanks,
Arpad
==================================================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Macro website : http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/
IBIS Macro reflector: //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro
To unsubscribe send an email:
To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: unsubscribe
--
Bob Ross
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC Teraspeed Labs
121 North River Drive 13610 SW Harness Lane
Narragansett, RI 02882 Beaverton, OR 97008
401-284-1827 503-430-1065
http://www.teraspeed.com 503-246-8048 Direct
bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Teraspeed is a registered service mark of Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Macro website : http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/
IBIS Macro reflector: //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro
To unsubscribe send an email:
To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: unsubscribe
Other related posts:
