I tend to agree with Walter. Maybe we can put this on the
known issues list for v7.0 and deal with it later… I don’t think
this would get in the way of anybody…
Thanks,
Arpad
================================================
From: ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Walter Katz
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 11:12 AM
To: mlabonte@xxxxxxxxxx; ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-editorial] Re: List_Tip wrongly placed
Mike,
At this point, I think we should concentrate on getting IBIS 7.0 out now. This
can be a list of things we do in IBIS 7.1 which we should limit to required
BIRD for DDR5 (like DC_Offset) and editorial changes like you found on your
trip and things like this.
Walter
Walter Katz
wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Office 978.461-0449 x 133
Mobile 720.417-3762
[cid:image002.jpg@01D47B36.D40C66E0]
From:
ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
On Behalf Of Mike LaBonte
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 12:05 PM
To: ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ibis-editorial] List_Tip wrongly placed
Editors,
List_Tip is described on page 217 of the 16 Nov IBIS 7.0
draft<https://ibis.org/editorial_wip/ver7_0_181116.docx>, within the list of
Formats. But List_Tip is not a Format and it should be described after Format.
Like Default, List_Tip enhances Format data, it is not the data.
If we agree, is this a change the Editorial Task Group should make now, or
would it call for a BIRD? I'm fine with the latter, since I have a whole list
of improvements that could be made.
Mike