[hipl-users] Re: Testing HIP association
- From: Lina <linalinaa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <hipl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:17:54 +0200
Thanks,
I downloaded /hipl/contrib/kernel/rpm/i386
new-kernel-pkg --mkinitrd --depmod --install --make-default 2.6.24.3-1FATAL:
Could not open '/boot/System.map-2.6.24.3-1': No such file or directoryNo
modules available for kernel "2.6.24.3-1".mkinitrd failed
My kernel: uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.23.17-88.fc7 #1 SMP Thu May 15 00:35:10 EDT
2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
I don't find the problem in the installation of the kernel
> Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:15:31 +0300
> From: samu.varjonen@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: hipl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [hipl-users] Re: Testing HIP association
>
> Hi, all
>
> You can find the newest kernels from here
> http://hipl.hiit.fi/hipl/contrib/kernel/
>
> They are already compiled ones, so just installing one that suites your
> operating system should be enough.
>
> Rpm is the one for fedora rest depends on the processor architecture
> i386 is good for most PCs and amd64 for 64-bit processors like intels
> dual cores and so on.
>
> BR, Samu
>
> PS. You can check which kernel you are currently running with
> 'uname -a' command. It will also tell you your processor architecture.
>
> Lina kirjoitti:
> >
> > OK, I ll try to compile it but it will be my first time.
> > Can you tell me which file I have to download for fedora 7?
> > kernel-2.6.23.12-1.src.rpm
> > <http://hipl.hiit.fi/hipl/release/latest/rpm/amd64/kernel-2.6.23.12-1.src.rpm>
> >
> > IN
> >
> >
> > /hipl/release/latest/rpm/amd64???
> >
> > And it's just enough to write so
> >
> > rpm --force -i kernel-2.6.23.12.rpm
> > new-kernel-pkg --mkinitrd --depmod --install --make-default 2.6.23.12
> >
> > Thanks
> > > Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:51:22 +0300
> > > From: laser.ru@xxxxxxxxx
> > > To: hipl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [hipl-users] Re: Testing HIP association
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I think you still need to compile the kernel. You can try one of the
> > > kernels here:
> > > http://hipl.hiit.fi/hipl/release/latest/rpm/
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Lina <linalinaa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Hello for all,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks so much for your replies.
> > > > To make things clearer:
> > > >
> > > > * I use hipl--release--1.0.3 (/hipl/release/latest/noarchI)
> > > > I download it from: http://hipl.hiit.fi/hipl/release/latest/noarch/
> > > >
> > > > * I use Fedora 7 and I have kernel 2.6, I didn't compile the
> > kernel. I read
> > > > that it's only necessary to do it if the Beet and IPsec mode aren't
> > > > supported.
> > > >
> > > > * The first patch in Doc/changelog in my installation is patch-309
> > > >
> > > > * For the responder oops:
> > > >
> > > > HIT: 2001:001b:0c44:8784:2d1b:96b2:b6c5:ad41
> > > >
> > > > IP6: 2001:660:3203:1000:204:75ff:feef:3140
> > > >
> > > > (I ping from crash on this @, and it's reachable)
> > > > /etc/hosts: I changed nothing
> > > > 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
> > > > ::1 localhost6.localdomain6 localhost6
> > > >
> > > > /etc/hip/hosts:
> > > > Nothing there, I added nothing
> > > > /etc/hip/hipd_config:
> > > > debug all
> > > >
> > > > * For the initiator crash:
> > > >
> > > > HIT: I can't show it
> > > > When i type: hipconf get hi default
> > > >
> > > > displaying ERROR and INFO debugging messages
> > > > (same thing when i put hipconf get hi all)
> > > >
> > > > and if i add debug all to hipd_config, i get
> > > >
> > > > Displaying error and INFO debugging messages
> > > > Unknown argument
> > > > Error: Cannot set the debugging parameter
> > > >
> > > > If i continue without showing the HIT by default and without debug
> > all and
> > > > try to make the connection I get the following:
> > > >
> > > > in the responder, i get;
> > > >
> > > > info(nlink.c:590@hip_parse_src_addr): tb[RTA_SRC] : 0x00000000
> > > > info(hidb.c:728@hip_for_each_hi): Found
> > > > HIT0x200100186e16bc7cbcf66a46391dcac6
> > > > info(hadb.c:230@hip_hadb_insert_state): ha->hit_our is:
> > > > 0x200100186e16bc7cbcf66a46391dcac6
> > > > info(hadb.c:231@hip_hadb_insert_state): ha->hit_peer is:
> > > > 0x2001001b0c4487842d1b96b2b6c5ad41
> > > > info(hidb.c:728@hip_for_each_hi): Found
> > > > HIT0x200100196a45fbb1016cade435ae5de9
> > > > info(hadb.c:230@hip_hadb_insert_state): ha->hit_our is:
> > > > 0x200100196a45fbb1016cade435ae5de9
> > > > info(hadb.c:231@hip_hadb_insert_state): ha->hit_peer is:
> > > > 0x2001001b0c4487842d1b96b2b6c5ad41
> > > > info(hidb.c:728@hip_for_each_hi): Found
> > > > HIT0x200100150921510b7f6424eb44b98e1c
> > > > info(hadb.c:230@hip_hadb_insert_state): ha->hit_our is:
> > > > 0x200100150921510b7f6424eb44b98e1c
> > > > info(hadb.c:231@hip_hadb_insert_state): ha->hit_peer is:
> > > > 0x2001001b0c4487842d1b96b2b6c5ad41
> > > > info(hidb.c:728@hip_for_each_hi): Found
> > > > HIT0x2001001c741c25010a07b0f4b9334c34
> > > > info(hadb.c:230@hip_hadb_insert_state): ha->hit_our is:
> > > > 0x2001001c741c25010a07b0f4b9334c34
> > > > info(hadb.c:231@hip_hadb_insert_state): ha->hit_peer is:
> > > > 0x2001001b0c4487842d1b96b2b6c5ad41
> > > > info(output.c:73@hip_send_i1): HIT
> > source0x200100186e16bc7cbcf66a46391dcac6
> > > > info(output.c:74@hip_send_i1): HIT
> > dest0x2001001b0c4487842d1b96b2b6c5ad41
> > > > info(output.c:772@hip_send_raw): dump:
> > > > info(output.c:772@hip_send_raw): dump:
> > > > info(output.c:772@hip_send_raw): dump
> > > >
> > > > And in oops the responder, I have:
> > > >
> > > > debug(nlink.c:56@hip_netlink_receive): Received a netlink message
> > > > debug(netdev.c:818@hip_netdev_event): handling msg type 20 ifindex=2
> > > > debug(netdev.c:838@hip_netdev_event): RTM_NEWADDR/DELADDR
> > > > debug(netdev.c:870@hip_netdev_event): Address event=add ifindex=2
> > > > debug(netdev.c:875@hip_netdev_event): 3 addr(s) in ifindex 2 before
> > add/del
> > > > debug(netdev.c:144@exists_address_in_list): mapped=1
> > > > debug(netdev.c:162@exists_address_in_list): n->addr.ss_family=10,
> > > > addr->sa_family=10, n->if_index=2, ifindex=2
> > > > debug(debug.c:649@hip_print_lsi): addr6: 157.159.100.217
> > > > debug(netdev.c:144@exists_address_in_list): mapped=0
> > > > debug(netdev.c:162@exists_address_in_list): n->addr.ss_family=10,
> > > > addr->sa_family=10, n->if_index=2, ifindex=2
> > > > debug(debug.c:671@hip_print_hit): addr6:
> > > > 2001:0660:3203:1000:0204:75ff:feef:3140
> > > > debug(netdev.c:879@hip_netdev_event): is_add=1, exists=1
> > > > debug(netdev.c:886@hip_netdev_event): Address add discarded.
> > > > debug(hipd.c:656@hipd_main): netlink route receive
> > > > debug(nlink.c:56@hip_netlink_receive): Received a netlink message
> > > > debug(netdev.c:818@hip_netdev_event): handling msg type 20 ifindex=2
> > > > debug(netdev.c:838@hip_netdev_event): RTM_NEWADDR/DELADDR
> > > > debug(netdev.c:870@hip_netdev_event): Address event=add ifindex=2
> > > > debug(netdev.c:875@hip_netdev_event): 3 addr(s) in ifindex 2 before
> > add/del
> > > > debug(netdev.c:144@exists_address_in_list): mapped=1
> > > > debug(netdev.c:162@exists_address_in_list): n->addr.ss_family=10,
> > > > addr->sa_family=10, n->if_index=2, ifindex=2
> > > > debug(debug.c:649@hip_print_lsi): addr6: 157.159.100.217
> > > > debug(netdev.c:144@exists_address_in_list): mapped=0
> > > > debug(netdev.c:162@exists_address_in_list): n->addr.ss_family=10,
> > > > addr->sa_family=10, n->if_index=2, ifindex=2
> > > > debug(debug.c:671@hip_print_hit): addr6:
> > > > 2001:0660:3203:1000:0204:75ff:feef:3140
> > > > debug(netdev.c:879@hip_netdev_event): is_add=1, exists=1
> > > > debug(netdev.c:886@hip_netdev_event): Address add discarded.
> > > >
> > > > I hope I was clearer than last times and hope really that any one
> > can give
> > > > me a help.
> > > > Thanks in advance
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > * For the i
> > > >
> > > >> Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:47:03 -0700
> > > >> From: miika.komu@xxxxxxx
> > > >> To: linalinaa@xxxxxxxxxx; hipl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >> Subject: Re: [hipl-users] Re: Testing HIP association
> > > >>
> > > >> Lina wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Lina,
> > > >>
> > > >> it does not really make any sense to try to guess what is wrong in
> > your
> > > >> installation until you tell which hipl version number you are using.
> > > >>
> > > >> * Did you use the latest 1.0.3 release?
> > > >> * Or did you use nightly tarball and build sources manually? Check
> > > >> doc/ChangeLog and report the first "patch-xx" version.
> > > >> * Did you use bleeding edge source version from the version control?
> > > >> Please report "tla logs|tail -1"
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks.
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hello,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks for your reply.
> > > >> > But I still don't know why I can't show the HIT if the host.
> > > >> > I put:
> > > >> > hipconf get hi default
> > > >> > I get:
> > > >> > Displaying ERROR and INFO debugging messages
> > > >> > Unknown argument
> > > >> > Error: Cannot set the debugging parameter.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I put in hosts degug all.
> > > >> > I don't know what's the problem.
> > > >> > And do I have to put the HIT of the intiator in the file of the
> > > >> > responder? Is it enough to do it once in the initiator only?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > Plus de 15 millions de français utilisent Windows Live Messenger !
> > > > Téléchargez Messenger, c'est gratuit !
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Andrey Lukyanenko.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Centralisez tous vos comptes mails dans Hotmail ! Créez un compte
> > Hotmail, c'est gratuit ! <http://www.windowslive.fr/hotmail/>
>
>
> --
> BR,
> Samu
>
> "Programmer is an organism that changes caffeine into code"
>
_________________________________________________________________
Caroline vient de mettre à jour son profil Messenger ! Connectez-vous !
http://login.live.com/login.srf?wa=wsignin1.0&rpsnv=10&ct=1198837564&rver=4.0.1534.0&wp=MBI&wreply=http:%2F%2Fhome.services.spaces.live.com%2F&lc=1036&id=73625
Other related posts:
