[hipl-users] Re: Testing HIP association
- From: "Andrey Lukyanenko" <laser.ru@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: hipl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:51:22 +0300
Hello,
I think you still need to compile the kernel. You can try one of the
kernels here:
http://hipl.hiit.fi/hipl/release/latest/rpm/
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Lina <linalinaa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello for all,
>
> Thanks so much for your replies.
> To make things clearer:
>
> * I use hipl--release--1.0.3 (/hipl/release/latest/noarchI)
> I download it from: http://hipl.hiit.fi/hipl/release/latest/noarch/
>
> * I use Fedora 7 and I have kernel 2.6, I didn't compile the kernel. I read
> that it's only necessary to do it if the Beet and IPsec mode aren't
> supported.
>
> * The first patch in Doc/changelog in my installation is patch-309
>
> * For the responder oops:
>
> HIT: 2001:001b:0c44:8784:2d1b:96b2:b6c5:ad41
>
> IP6: 2001:660:3203:1000:204:75ff:feef:3140
>
> (I ping from crash on this @, and it's reachable)
> /etc/hosts: I changed nothing
> 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
> ::1 localhost6.localdomain6 localhost6
>
> /etc/hip/hosts:
> Nothing there, I added nothing
> /etc/hip/hipd_config:
> debug all
>
> * For the initiator crash:
>
> HIT: I can't show it
> When i type: hipconf get hi default
>
> displaying ERROR and INFO debugging messages
> (same thing when i put hipconf get hi all)
>
> and if i add debug all to hipd_config, i get
>
> Displaying error and INFO debugging messages
> Unknown argument
> Error: Cannot set the debugging parameter
>
> If i continue without showing the HIT by default and without debug all and
> try to make the connection I get the following:
>
> in the responder, i get;
>
> info(nlink.c:590@hip_parse_src_addr): tb[RTA_SRC] : 0x00000000
> info(hidb.c:728@hip_for_each_hi): Found
> HIT0x200100186e16bc7cbcf66a46391dcac6
> info(hadb.c:230@hip_hadb_insert_state): ha->hit_our is:
> 0x200100186e16bc7cbcf66a46391dcac6
> info(hadb.c:231@hip_hadb_insert_state): ha->hit_peer is:
> 0x2001001b0c4487842d1b96b2b6c5ad41
> info(hidb.c:728@hip_for_each_hi): Found
> HIT0x200100196a45fbb1016cade435ae5de9
> info(hadb.c:230@hip_hadb_insert_state): ha->hit_our is:
> 0x200100196a45fbb1016cade435ae5de9
> info(hadb.c:231@hip_hadb_insert_state): ha->hit_peer is:
> 0x2001001b0c4487842d1b96b2b6c5ad41
> info(hidb.c:728@hip_for_each_hi): Found
> HIT0x200100150921510b7f6424eb44b98e1c
> info(hadb.c:230@hip_hadb_insert_state): ha->hit_our is:
> 0x200100150921510b7f6424eb44b98e1c
> info(hadb.c:231@hip_hadb_insert_state): ha->hit_peer is:
> 0x2001001b0c4487842d1b96b2b6c5ad41
> info(hidb.c:728@hip_for_each_hi): Found
> HIT0x2001001c741c25010a07b0f4b9334c34
> info(hadb.c:230@hip_hadb_insert_state): ha->hit_our is:
> 0x2001001c741c25010a07b0f4b9334c34
> info(hadb.c:231@hip_hadb_insert_state): ha->hit_peer is:
> 0x2001001b0c4487842d1b96b2b6c5ad41
> info(output.c:73@hip_send_i1): HIT source0x200100186e16bc7cbcf66a46391dcac6
> info(output.c:74@hip_send_i1): HIT dest0x2001001b0c4487842d1b96b2b6c5ad41
> info(output.c:772@hip_send_raw): dump:
> info(output.c:772@hip_send_raw): dump:
> info(output.c:772@hip_send_raw): dump
>
> And in oops the responder, I have:
>
> debug(nlink.c:56@hip_netlink_receive): Received a netlink message
> debug(netdev.c:818@hip_netdev_event): handling msg type 20 ifindex=2
> debug(netdev.c:838@hip_netdev_event): RTM_NEWADDR/DELADDR
> debug(netdev.c:870@hip_netdev_event): Address event=add ifindex=2
> debug(netdev.c:875@hip_netdev_event): 3 addr(s) in ifindex 2 before add/del
> debug(netdev.c:144@exists_address_in_list): mapped=1
> debug(netdev.c:162@exists_address_in_list): n->addr.ss_family=10,
> addr->sa_family=10, n->if_index=2, ifindex=2
> debug(debug.c:649@hip_print_lsi): addr6: 157.159.100.217
> debug(netdev.c:144@exists_address_in_list): mapped=0
> debug(netdev.c:162@exists_address_in_list): n->addr.ss_family=10,
> addr->sa_family=10, n->if_index=2, ifindex=2
> debug(debug.c:671@hip_print_hit): addr6:
> 2001:0660:3203:1000:0204:75ff:feef:3140
> debug(netdev.c:879@hip_netdev_event): is_add=1, exists=1
> debug(netdev.c:886@hip_netdev_event): Address add discarded.
> debug(hipd.c:656@hipd_main): netlink route receive
> debug(nlink.c:56@hip_netlink_receive): Received a netlink message
> debug(netdev.c:818@hip_netdev_event): handling msg type 20 ifindex=2
> debug(netdev.c:838@hip_netdev_event): RTM_NEWADDR/DELADDR
> debug(netdev.c:870@hip_netdev_event): Address event=add ifindex=2
> debug(netdev.c:875@hip_netdev_event): 3 addr(s) in ifindex 2 before add/del
> debug(netdev.c:144@exists_address_in_list): mapped=1
> debug(netdev.c:162@exists_address_in_list): n->addr.ss_family=10,
> addr->sa_family=10, n->if_index=2, ifindex=2
> debug(debug.c:649@hip_print_lsi): addr6: 157.159.100.217
> debug(netdev.c:144@exists_address_in_list): mapped=0
> debug(netdev.c:162@exists_address_in_list): n->addr.ss_family=10,
> addr->sa_family=10, n->if_index=2, ifindex=2
> debug(debug.c:671@hip_print_hit): addr6:
> 2001:0660:3203:1000:0204:75ff:feef:3140
> debug(netdev.c:879@hip_netdev_event): is_add=1, exists=1
> debug(netdev.c:886@hip_netdev_event): Address add discarded.
>
> I hope I was clearer than last times and hope really that any one can give
> me a help.
> Thanks in advance
>
>
> * For the i
>
>> Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:47:03 -0700
>> From: miika.komu@xxxxxxx
>> To: linalinaa@xxxxxxxxxx; hipl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [hipl-users] Re: Testing HIP association
>>
>> Lina wrote:
>>
>> Hi Lina,
>>
>> it does not really make any sense to try to guess what is wrong in your
>> installation until you tell which hipl version number you are using.
>>
>> * Did you use the latest 1.0.3 release?
>> * Or did you use nightly tarball and build sources manually? Check
>> doc/ChangeLog and report the first "patch-xx" version.
>> * Did you use bleeding edge source version from the version control?
>> Please report "tla logs|tail -1"
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Thanks for your reply.
>> > But I still don't know why I can't show the HIT if the host.
>> > I put:
>> > hipconf get hi default
>> > I get:
>> > Displaying ERROR and INFO debugging messages
>> > Unknown argument
>> > Error: Cannot set the debugging parameter.
>> >
>> > I put in hosts degug all.
>> > I don't know what's the problem.
>> > And do I have to put the HIT of the intiator in the file of the
>> > responder? Is it enough to do it once in the initiator only?
>>
>>
>
> ________________________________
> Plus de 15 millions de français utilisent Windows Live Messenger !
> Téléchargez Messenger, c'est gratuit !
--
Best regards,
Andrey Lukyanenko.
Other related posts:
