I have the Leica M9 and a WATE (16-18-21 mm 4,0) which possibly is the closest to a 'digital SWC'. Allegedly with micro lenses. To what I can see; it is mostly software corrections in the corners that makes this possible. It works OK, but is not perfect. When thinking of how popular the SWC was it is likely that a digital version would do good too. May be it is not possible to have the same field of view yet with a digital version. But how far is it possible to go and retain the excellent SWC properties? I wonder. Tom of Oslo > From: Richard Man [richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 2012-03-30 08:16:10 MEST > To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [HUG ] Re: SV: Re: SWC: I think I understand now... > > I heard that all digital backs without microlens (meaning every one except > Phase One's P30/30+) work fine. You have the 645 crop at best though, and > 33x44 at "worst." > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Tom Just Olsen <tjols@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Why could'nt Hasselblad (or somebody) try to make a digital version of the > > SWC? > > > > Tom of Oslo > > > > > -- > // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> > // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/> > // richard's personal photo blog: <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous > replies in your msgs. ]