Quoth "arougthopher": > >Now with my ranting completed, let me get to my point. I am officially >voting for BeZilla to be the OBOS browser of choice. This is not just >because I am working on it, either. First, with BeZilla, we as a team, >not only have ourselves, but hundreds if not more, developers working >on the project. Luckily, we only have to worry about one part of that >project, and that is making it run under BeOS. Well, for the most >part, that's taken care of. Now, we just need to make it better. >Second, Mozilla gets a lot of press,. We could ride their coat tails, >so to speak, for a little publicity ourselves. Third, it is one of the >most standard compliant browsers on the market. Forth, it is >embedable, so we could take just the browser part, and make a smaller >application. Fifth, a lot of the work is already done. Sixth, it >brings familiarity to users who know nothing about OBOS, or BeOS for >that matter. Plus probably some other good reasons, I can't think of >right now. Personally, I agree 100%. Mozilla is the easiest choice, and a lot of the BeOS features someone mentioned as not being used in Mozilla could (as far as I know) be relatively easily implemented and incorporated in Mozilla. We'll get the benefit of any open-source modules that are written for mozilla as well. It just seems like a good idea, to me.