> I like the ability to run slide shows. > > I am not conserned with the file size. Useful feautures are often > welcome. My BeOS partition is 5 GB and my TestOpenBeOS partition is 4 > GB. > > My point is if the user selects a program called "Show Image" (singular) > and then selects a file (singular) and is pressented with an option to > go to the next image it is a flaw in your user interface design. It is > adding a feature that has no real use within your user interaction, ie > bloat. When I implemented "show next/previous image" I took BeMail as an example. Nobody complaints that BeMail is not named BeMails. The dia show was just a consequence of the navigation feature. But I agree with Axel that the navigation feature it is not very intuitive, I will change it so it works the same way as it does in BeMail. > Call the program "Show Images" and provide slide shows when a directory, > query or multi-image file is selected is a consistant user interface > design. > > Does the coder responsible for the existing app accept that change ?!? > (Iff you want will accept my change.) Michael Wilber (Translation Kit leader) is responsible for ShowImage and AFAIK is not subscribed to this list. > BTW remember "ShowImage" as the file name may be required by existing > apps and scripts. - Michael Print Kit leader who thought improving ShowImage could not hurt...